User talk:Nergaal/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 ← Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9


The Signpost: 02 January 2012

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

The Signpost: 30 January 2012

WikiCup 2012 January newsletter

WikiCup 2012 is off to a flying start. At the time of writing, we have 112 contestants; comparable to last year, but slightly fewer than 2010. Signups will remain open for another week, after which time they will be closed for this year. Our currrent far-away leader is Conradh na Gaeilge Grapple X (submissions), due mostly to his work on a slew of good articles about The X-Files; there remain many such articles waiting to be reviewed at good article candidates. Second place is currently held by Minnesota Ruby2010 (submissions), whose points come mostly from good articles about television episodes, although good article reviews, did you knows and an article about a baroness round out the score. In third place is Mauritius Jivesh boodhun (submissions), who has scored 200 points for his work on a single featured article, as well as points for work on others, mostly in the area of pop music. In all, nine users have 100 or more points. However, at the other end of the scale, there are still dozens of participants who are yet to score. Please remember to update your submission pages promptly!

The 64 highest scoring participants will advance to round 2 in a month's time. There, they will be split into eight random groups of eight. The score needed to reach the next round is not at all clear; last year, 8 points guaranteed a place. The year before, 20.

A few participants and their work warrant a mention for achieving "firsts" in this competition.

  • Florida 12george1 (submissions) was the first to score, with his good article review of Illinois v. McArthur.
  • Florida 12george1 (submissions) was also the first to score points for an article, thanks to his work on Hurricane Debby (1982)- now a good article. Tropical storms have featured heavily in the Cup, and good articles currently have a relatively fast turnaround time for reviews.
  • Russia Sp33dyphil (submissions) was the first to score points for a did you know, with Russian submarine K-114 Tula. Military history is another subject which has seen a lot of Cup activity.
  • Russia Sp33dyphil (submissions) is also the first person to successfully claim bonus points. Terminator 2: Judgment Day is now a good article, and was eligible for bonus points because the subject was covered on more than 20 other Wikipedias at the start of the competition. It is fantastic to see bonus points being claimed so early!
  • Byzantine Empire Speciate (submissions) was the first to score points for an In the News entry, with Paedophryne amauensis. The lead image from the article was also used on the main page for a time, and it's certainly eye-catching!
  • Mauritius Jivesh boodhun (submissions) was the first to score points for a featured article, and is, at the moment, the only competitor to claim for one. The article, "Halo" (Beyoncé Knowles song), was also worth double points because of its wide coverage. While this is an article that Jivesh and others have worked on for some time, it is undeniable that he has put considerable work into it this year, pushing it over the edge.

We are yet to see any featured lists, featured topics or good topics, but this is unsurprising; firstly, the nomination processes with each of these can take some time, and, secondly, it can take a considerable amount of time to work content to this level. In a similar vein, we have seen only one featured article. The requirement that content must have been worked on this year to be eligible means that we did not expect to see these at the start of the competition. No points have been claimed for featured portals or pictures, but these are not content types which are often claimed; the former has never made a big impact on the WikiCup, while the latter has not done so since 2009's competition.

A quick rules clarification before the regular notices: If you are concerned that another user is claiming points inappropriately, please contact a judge to take a look at the article. Competitors policing one another can create a bad atmosphere, and may lead to inconsistencies and mistakes. Rest assured that we, the judges, are making an effort to check submissions, but it is possible that we will miss something. On a loosely related note: If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 00:14, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Null?

Hi Nergaal, can you explain to me why you put [NULL] in the citations here? It clutters the citations and the parameter could just as well have been left empty, no? Hekerui (talk) 14:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

That was a bot edit. Nergaal (talk) 17:44, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Nergaal. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Music of the Sun /archive1.
Message added 19:20, 3 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Aaron • You Da One 19:20, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Please look back at the nomination. It has developed. Aaron • You Da One 23:05, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Nergaal. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Elements/Pictures.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nicholasb07 (talk) 06:04, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

Vote for a flagship article (WT:ELEM)

The rules have been changed to allow voting for more than one element. You can now vote for additional elements if you want to. If I misinterpreted your vote, please change the periodic table accordingly. Double sharp (talk) 11:26, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Element pages and new cites

Hello, would you please revisit the articles Period 5 element and Period 7 element and add in the various citations from the other articles you are copying from? The text you are carrying over only includes the ref names, not the entire cite. Please look at the references sections at the bottom to get a list of the names of the cites. Thanks! - Salamurai (talk) 00:48, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Period 3 element, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mortar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 February 2012

The Signpost: 20 February 2012

The Signpost: 27 February 2012

WikiCup 2012 February newsletter

Round 1 is already over! The 64 highest scorers have progressed to round 2. Our highest scorer was Conradh na Gaeilge Grapple X (submissions), again thanks mostly to a swathe of good articles on The X-Files. In second place was United Kingdom Tigerboy1966 (submissions), thanks an impressive list of did you knows about racehorses. Both scored over 400 points. Following behind with over 300 points were Minnesota Ruby2010 (submissions), Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions), Wisconsin Miyagawa (submissions) and Scotland Casliber (submissions). February also saw the competition's first featured list: List of colleges and universities in North Dakota, from Minnesota Ruby2010 (submissions). At the other end of the scale, 11 points was enough to secure a place in this round, and some contestants with 10 points made it into the round on a tiebreaker. This is higher than the 8 points that were needed last year, but lower than the 20 points required the year before. The number of points required to progress to round 3 will be significantly higher.

The remaining contestants have been split into 8 pools of 8, named A through H. Round two will finish in two months time on 28 April, when the two highest scorers in each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers, will progress to round 3. The pools were entirely random, so while some pools may end up being more competitive than others, this is by chance rather than design.

The judges would like to point out two quick rules reminders. First, any content promoted during the interim period (that is, on or after 27 February) is eligible for points in round 2. Second, any content worked on significantly this year is eligible for points if promoted in this round. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which would otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 March 2012

The Signpost: 12 March 2012

The Signpost: 19 March 2012

The Signpost: 26 March 2012

Smile!

A Barnstar!
A smile for you
You’ve just received a random act of kindness! 66.87.7.109 (talk) 22:35, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 March newsletter

We are over half way through the second round of this year's WikiCup and things are going well! Conradh na Gaeilge Grapple X (submissions), of Pool B, is our highest overall scorer thanks to his prolific writings on television and film. In second place is Pool H's Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions), thanks primarily to work on biological articles, especially in marine biology and herpetology. Third place goes to Pool E's Scotland Casliber (submissions), who also writes primarily on biology (including ornithology and botany) and has already submitted two featured articles this round. Of the 63 contestants remaining, 15 (just under a quarter) have over 100 points this round. However, 25 are yet to score. Please remember to update your submission pages promptly. 32 contestants, the top two from each pool and the 16 next-highest scorers, will advance to round 3.

Congratulations to Vanuatu Matthewedwards (submissions), whose impressive File:Wacht am Rhein map (Opaque).svg became the competition's first featured picture. Also, congratulations to Florida 12george1 (submissions), who claimed good topic points, our first contestant this year to do so, for his work on Wikipedia:Featured topics/1982 Atlantic hurricane season. This leaves featured topics and featured portals as the only sources of points not yet utilised. However, as recent statistics from Wisconsin Miyagawa (submissions) show, no source has yet been utilised this competition to the same extent it has been previously!

It has been observed that the backlogs at good article candidates are building up again. While the points for good article reviews will be remaining constant, any help that can be offered keeping the backlog down would be appreciated. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:24, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

Your GA nomination of Group 12 element

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Group 12 element you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 2 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. I have already read the article multiple times, so, if everything goes well I hope to finish the review within two days. You can join the discussion in GA review page --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 22:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)


Your GA nomination of Group 12 element

The article Group 12 element you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Group 12 element for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and review a nominated article yourself? Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 20:14, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. When you recently edited Compounds of lead, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lead acetate and Lead sulfide (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

Copernicium sourcing

The source you added for the unreferenced "8.9 min half-life" claim was identified as a WP mirror, and consequently removed, by Headbomb. Do you know another, reliable source for this claim? Otherwise it should be re-tagged as unreferenced. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 20:29, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

WikiCup 2012 April newsletter

Round 2 of this year's WikiCup is over, and so we are down to our final 32, in what could be called our quarter-finals. The two highest scorers from each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers overall, have entered round 3, while 30 participants have been eliminated. Pool B's Conradh na Gaeilge Grapple X (submissions) remains our top scorer with over 700 points; he continues to gain high numbers of points for his good articles on The X-Files, but also Millennium and other subjects. He has also gained points for a good topic, a featured list, multiple good article reviews and several did you knows. Pool E's Scotland Casliber (submissions) was second, thanks primarily to his biology articles, with Pool H's New York City Muboshgu (submissions) coming in third, with an impressive 46 did you knows, mostly on the subject of baseball. Casliber and Cwmhiraeth both scored over 600 points. Pools E and H proved our most successful, with each seeing 5 members qualify for round 3, while Pools C and D were the least, with each seeing only 3 reach round 3. However, it was Pool G which saw the lowest scoring, with a little under 400 points combined; Pool H, the highest scoring group, saw over triple that score.

65 points was the lowest qualifying score for round 3; significantly higher than the 11 required to enter round 2, and also higher than the 41 required to reach round 3 last year. However, in 2010, 100 points were needed to secure a place in round 3. 16 will progress to round 4. In round 3, 150 points was the 16th highest score, though, statistically, people tend to up their game a little in later rounds. Last year, 76 points secured a place, while in 2010, a massive 250 points were needed. Guessing how many points will be required is not easy. We still have not seen any featured portals or topics this year, but, on the subject of less common content types, a small correction needs to be made to the previous newsletter: File:Wacht am Rhein map (Opaque).svg, our first featured picture, was the work of both Vanuatu Matthewedwards (submissions) and United Kingdom Grandiose (submissions), the latter of whom has also gone on to score with File:Map of the Battle of Guam, 1944.svg. Bonus points also continue to roll in; this round, England Ealdgyth (submissions) earned triple points for her good articles on William the Conqueror and the Middle Ages, Casliber and Cwmhiraeth both earned triple points for their work on Western Jackdaw, now a good article, Michigan Dana Boomer (submissions) earned triple points for her work on lettuce and work by Bavaria Stone (submissions) to ready antimony for good article status earned him triple points. United Kingdom Jarry1250 (submissions) managed to expand Vitus Bering far enough for a did you know, which was also worth triple points. All of these highly important topics featured on 50 or more Wikipedias at the start of the year.

An article on the WikiCup in the Wikimedia Blog, "Improving Wikipedia with friendly competition", was posted at the end of April. This may be of interest to those who are signed up to this newsletter, as well as serving as another way to draw attention to our project. Also, we would again like to thank United Kingdom Jarry1250 (submissions) and Bavaria Stone (submissions), for continued help behind the scenes. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:17, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

GAR

Good article reassessment for Literary sources for the origin of the Romanians

Literary sources for the origin of the Romanians has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 11:28, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

WikiCup 2012 May newsletter

We're halfway through round 3 (or the quarter finals, if you prefer) and things are running smoothly. We're seeing very high scoring; as of the time of writing, the top 16 all have over 90 points. This has already proved to be more competative than this time last year- in 2011, 76 points secured a place, while in 2010, a massive 250 was the lowest qualifying score. People have also upped their game slightly from last round, which is to be expected as we approach the end of the competition. Leading Pool A is Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions), whose points have mostly come from a large number of did you knows on marine biology. Pool B's leader, Conradh na Gaeilge Grapple X (submissions), is for the first time not our highest scorer at the time of newsletter publication, but his good articles on The X-Files and Millenium keep him in second place overall. Wisconsin Miyagawa (submissions) leads Pool C, our quietest pool, with content in a variety of areas on a variety of topics. Pool D is led by Scotland Casliber (submissions), our current overall leader. Nearly half of Casliber's points come from his triple-scored Western Jackdaw, which is now a featured article.

This round has seen an unusually high number of featured lists, with nearly one in five remaining participants claiming one, and one user, New York City Muboshgu (submissions), claiming two. Miyagawa's featured list, 1936 Summer Olympics medal table, was even awarded double points. By comparison, good article reviews seem to be playing a smaller part, and featured topics portals remain two content-types still unutilised in this competition. Other than that, there isn't much to say! Things are coming along smoothly. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:40, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

List of Dexter episodes WP:FLRC nomination

I have nominated List of Dexter episodes for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Matthewedwards (talk · contribs) 18:44, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Zanzibar women's national football team/archive1

Hi. Addressed concerns at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Zanzibar women's national football team/archive1. --LauraHale (talk) 23:57, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Talk:List of multiplanetary systems

I was able to just complete the template. Take a look and let me know what you think. :) -- A Certain White Cat chi? 21:36, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Nergaal,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Jokulsarlon Panorama.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 15, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-06-15. —howcheng {chat} 19:54, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Nergaal,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Lutheran Cathedral Helsinki edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 23, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-06-23. —howcheng {chat} 21:34, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

WikiCup 2012 June newsletter

Apologies for the lateness of this letter; our usual bot wasn't working. We are now entering round 4, our semi-finals, and have our final 16. A score of 243 was required to reach this round; significantly more than 2011's 76 points, and only a little behind 2010's 250 points. By comparison, last year, 150 points in round 4 secured a place in the final; in 2010, 430 were needed. Commiserations to Pool A's Minas Gerais igordebraga (submissions), who scored 242 points, missing out on a place in the round by a whisker. However, congratulations to Pool B's Conradh na Gaeilge Grapple X (submissions), whose television articles have brought him another round victory. Pool A's Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) came second overall, with an impressive list of biological did you knows, good articles and featured articles. Third overall was Pool D's New York City Muboshgu (submissions), with a long list of contibutions, mostly relating to baseball. Of course, with the points resetting every round, the playing field has been levelled. The most successful Pool was Pool D, which saw seven into the final round. Pool B saw four, C saw three and Pool A saw only the two round leaders.

A quick note about other competitions taking place on Wikipedia which may be of interest. There are 13 days remaining in the June-July GAN backlog elimination drive, but it is not too late to take part. August will also see the return of The Core Contest- a one month long competition first run in 2007. While the WikiCup awards points for audited content on any subject, The Core Contest about is raw article improvement, focussing heavily on the most important articles on Wikipedia. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 11:04, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 July 2012

The Signpost: 09 July 2012

Rutherfordium-267

Nergaal,

About this edit: are you sure that 267Rf undergoes electron capture? Dubna gives SF only; WolframAlpha gives SF and alpha (which is theoretical, I think). I do not think that 267Lr is beta-stable; possibly 265Lr would be, so 267Lr would decay to 267Rf and not vice versa. Additionally, the Brookhaven Nuclide Chart does not state anything about the half-life of 267Rf, and the page Isotopes of rutherfordium gives other values (theoretical and practical) 188.134.48.52 (talk) 16:19, 3 July 2012 (UTC).

I have corrected wrong decay. Burzuchius (talk) 19:45, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi t | c 17:26, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 July 2012

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Nergaal,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Spirobranchus giganteus (Red and white christmas tree worm).jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on July 30, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-07-30. —howcheng {chat} 17:09, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

2012 Summer Olympics marketing

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 2012 Summer Olympics marketing, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://olympicgames-tickets.blogspot.com/2012/04/merchandise-for-olympics-2012.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:08, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello, you wrote in an edit summary that information about the logo of the London 2012 Olympic Games is available in a sub-article. Exactly which sub-article is this? JIP | Talk 19:31, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

2012_Summer_Olympic_development#Logo_and_graphics. Nergaal (talk) 19:59, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 July 2012

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Nergaal,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Anas platyrhynchos male female quadrat.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on August 3, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-08-03. —howcheng {chat} 17:31, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 July newsletter

We're approaching the beginning of 2012's final round. Pool A sees Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) as the leader, with 300 points being awarded for the featured article Bivalvia, and Pool B sees Conradh na Gaeilge Grapple X (submissions) in the lead, with 10 good articles, and over 35 articles eligible for good topic points. Pool A sees New York City Muboshgu (submissions) in second place with a number of articles relating to baseball, while Pool B's Minnesota Ruby2010 (submissions) follows Grapple X, with a variety of contributions including the high-scoring, high-importance featured article on the 2010 film Pride & Prejudice. Ruby2010, like Grapple X, also claimed a number of good topic points; despite this, not a single point has been claimed for featured topics in the contest so far. The same is true for featured portals.

Currently, the eighth-place competitor (and so the lowest scorer who would reach the final round right now) has scored 332, more than double the 150 needed to reach the final round last year. In 2010, however, 430 was the lowest qualifying score. In this competition, we have generally seen scores closer to those in 2010 than those in 2011. Let's see what kind of benchmark we can set for future competitions! As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 22:30, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Epic Barnstar
For the Curiosity rover ITN nominated. Great timing, in before it's news. Well done. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 15:30, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Regards, SunCreator (talk) 15:30, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 August 2012

The Signpost: 13 August 2012

The Signpost: 20 August 2012

Talkback

Hello, Nergaal. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Dexter episodes/archive1.
Message added 04:47, 23 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cheers, TBrandley 04:47, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Nergaal. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of number-one adult contemporary singles of 2011 (U.S.)/archive1.
Message added 15:31, 24 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Aaron • You Da One 15:31, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 August 2012

WikiCup 2012 August newsletter

The final is upon us! We are down to our final 8. A massive 573 was our lowest qualifying score; this is higher than the 150 points needed last year and the 430 needed in 2010. Even in 2009, when points were acquired for mainspace edit count in addition to audited content, 417 points secured a place. That leaves this year's WikiCup, by one measure at least, our most competitive ever. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:

  1. Conradh na Gaeilge Grapple X (submissions) once again finishes the round in first place, leading Pool B. Grapple X writes articles about television, and especially The X-Files and Millenium, with good articles making up the bulk of the score.
  2. Wisconsin Miyagawa (submissions) led Pool A this round. Fourth-place finalist last year, Miyagawa writes on a variety of topics, and has reached the final primarily off the back of his massive number of did you knows.
  3. Minnesota Ruby2010 (submissions) was second in Pool B. Ruby2010 writes primarily on television and film, and scores primarily from good articles.
  4. Scotland Casliber (submissions) finished third in Pool B. Casliber is something of a WikiCup veteran, having finished sixth in 2011 and fourth in 2010. Casliber writes on the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy. Over half of Casliber's points this round were bonus points from the high-importance articles he has worked on.
  5. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) came second in Pool A. Also writing on biology, especially marine biology, Cwmhiraeth received 390 points for one featured article (Bivalvia) and one good article (pelican), topping up with a large number of did you knows.
  6. New York City Muboshgu (submissions) was third in Pool A. Muboshgu writes primarily on baseball, and this round saw Muboshgu's first featured article, Derek Jeter, promoted on its fourth attempt at FAC.
  7. Michigan Dana Boomer (submissions) was fourth in Pool A. She writes on a variety of topics, including horses, but this round also saw the high-importance lettuce reach featured article status.
  8. Canada Sasata (submissions) is another WikiCup veteran, having been a finalist in 2009 and 2010. He writes mostly on mycology.

However, we must also say goodbye to the eight who did not make the final, having fallen at the last hurdle: Russia GreatOrangePumpkin (submissions), England Ealdgyth (submissions), England Calvin999 (submissions), Poland Piotrus (submissions), North Carolina Toa Nidhiki05 (submissions), Florida 12george1 (submissions), Cherokee Nation The Bushranger (submissions) and North Macedonia 1111tomica (submissions). We hope to see you all next year.

On the subject of next year, a discussion has been opened here. Come and have your say about the competition, and how you'd like it to run in the future. This brainstorming will go on for some time before more focused discussions/polls are opened. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:20, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of United States federal officials convicted of corruption offenses/archive1

Obviously, I have fixed the first sentence. The error was recently introduced by FLC-related changes. Savidan 01:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Could you please be more specific about what you want added to the intro? Savidan 01:44, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
I did what I could. I have original research concerns with the rest. Savidan 06:07, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Would you please consider revisiting the FLC? Thanks. Savidan 09:55, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

List of Formula One fatal accidents

Does your oppose still stand? If so could you be kind enough to clarify which criteria you believe it fails to meet? Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:51, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 September 2012

Talkback

Hello, Nergaal. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of The X-Files episodes/archive1.
Message added 03:20, 8 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TBrandley 03:20, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

FLCs

Hello. You have opposed a number of FLCs, most of which have been responded to. If you possibly have the time, could you revisit them please? Thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:56, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello. Aaron asked you a question here a couple of weeks ago, could you possibly help him out there? Thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:42, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 September 2012

The Signpost: 17 September 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

WikiCup 2012 September newsletter

We're over half way through the final, and so it is less than a month until we know for certain our 2012 WikiCup champion. Conradh na Gaeilge Grapple X (submissions) currently leads, followed by Canada Sasata (submissions), Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and Scotland Casliber (submissions). However, we have no one resembling a breakaway leader, and so the competition is a long way from over. Next month's newsletter will feature a list of our winners (who are not necessarily only the finalists) and keep your eyes open for an article on the WikiCup in a future edition of The Signpost. The leaders are already on a par with last year's winners, but a long way from the huge scores seen in 2010. That said, a repeat of the competition from 2010 seems unlikely.

It is good to see that three-quarters of our finalists have already scored bonus points this round. This shows that, contrary to criticism that the WikiCup has received in the past, the competition does not merely incentivise the writing of trivial articles; instead, our top competitors are still spending their time contributing to high-importance articles, and bringing them to a high standard. This does a great service to the encyclopedia and its readers. Thank you, and good work!

The planning for next year's WikiCup is ongoing. Some straw polls have been opened concerning the scoring, and you can now sign up for next year's competition. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 19:59, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

Wikipedia:Peer review/FC Bayern Munich/archive1

Could you do a peer review of the article? Pleae and thanks. Kingjeff (talk) 21:58, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

Meitnerium

I finished rewriting the Meitnerium article for you and put it on GAN. What do you think? Double sharp (talk) 13:55, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Nice job! Thanks for taking care of that. Keep up the good work with the 4th row of the d-block elements. Maybe in the enar future we can have all the d-groups at GT. Nergaal (talk) 17:14, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
We'll also have to fix the very important articles Fe, Ag, and Au for that. :-) Double sharp (talk) 03:10, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Here's a table of the current statuses of the d-block transactinides:

GA GAN Being worked on Others
Rutherfordium
Copernicium
Meitnerium		 Roentgenium
Darmstadtium		 Hassium Dubnium
Seaborgium
Bohrium

Rg was probably the easiest (apart from Mt, which was already half-done). There wasn't so much nucleosynthesis information and there were more citations already present. Double sharp (talk) 04:00, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

BTW, when working on Ds, I cut many of the hot fusion reactions because they were failures and were uncited. Double sharp (talk) 08:41, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
That should be fine. Elements that have sufficient successful production pathways don't need to include the unsuccessful ones as long as these are discussed in the isotopes sub-article. Nergaal (talk) 14:54, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

Romney

Hi, the article does discuss his donations to his church. I replied at the FAC page. Cheers.Anythingyouwant (talk) 03:29, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you again at your talk page. "Tithing" was explicitly in the article for months until earlier today, when I mistakenly changed it to "donating". I feel badly about this, and hope you will reconsider now that I've restored it. My intent was merely to find a verb that would apply to both his tithing and his other donations to the church. Anyway, if you would please take a look that would be much appreciated. Thanks. Note that tithing has always been wikilinked, and now it also explicitly appears in the article, as it did for months until I screwed up earlier today. Cheers.Anythingyouwant (talk) 04:45, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Following up on this, there are pending responses to your continuing objection at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mitt Romney/archive2. Since you do a lot of featured content work yourself, I'm sure you know that we would like to resolve your objection if at all possible. Wasted Time R (talk) 12:33, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 October 2012

Mitt Romney

Hi. A couple of us contributing at the Romney FAC at present don't share your view re the level of info about church involvement. I left a note there about three days ago asking if you could specify any particular content that you though was missing, but perhaps should have pinged you here. I was hoping you might drop by at the FAC and comment. Cheers, hamiltonstone (talk) 09:04, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 October 2012

WikiCup 2012 October newsletter

The 2012 WikiCup has come to a close; congratulations to Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions), our 2012 champion! Cwmhiraeth joins our exclusive club of previous winners: Dreamafter (2007), jj137 (2008), Durova (2009), Sturmvogel 66 (2010) and Hurricanehink (2011). Our final standings were as follows:

  1. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions)
  2. Canada Sasata (submissions)
  3. Conradh na Gaeilge Grapple X (submissions)
  4. Scotland Casliber (submissions)
  5. New York City Muboshgu (submissions)
  6. Wisconsin Miyagawa (submissions)
  7. Minnesota Ruby2010 (submissions)
  8. Michigan Dana Boomer (submissions)

Prizes for first, second, third and fourth will be awarded, as will prizes for all those who reached the final eight. Every participant who scored in the competition will receive a ribbon of participation. In addition to the prizes based on placement, the following special prizes will be awarded based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, the prize is awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round.

Awards will be handed out in the coming days; please bear with us! This year's competition also saw fantastic contributions in all rounds, from newer Wikipedians contributing their first good or featured articles, right up to highly experienced Wikipedians chasing high scores and contributing to topics outside of their usual comfort zones. It would be impossible to name all of the participants who have achieved things to be proud of, but well done to all of you, and thanks! Wikipedia has certainly benefited from the work of this year's WikiCup participants.

Next year's WikiCup will begin in January. Currently, discussions and polls are open, and all contributions are welcome. You can also sign up for next year's competition. There will be no further newsletters this year, although brief notes may be sent out in December to remind everyone about the upcoming competition. It's been a pleasure to work with you all, and we hope to see you all in January! J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:37, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Nergaal,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Apis mellifera carnica worker hive entrance 3.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 3, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-11-03. —howcheng {chat} 18:59, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Ununpentium (fictional element)

As you have being involved, your opinions would be appreciated there. Also I´d like to suggest a quick look in the summaries. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Element 115 in popular culture. Eka-bismuth (talk) 21:13, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 November 2012

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Nergaal,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Webcam CT transmissions.OGG is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 9, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-11-09. —howcheng {chat} 17:32, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 November 2012

List of Prime Ministers of Pakistan

Hi, any chance you could have a look at Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Prime Ministers of Pakistan/archive1? Regards, Zia Khan 20:31, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Hassium

I finished rewriting hassium. How is it? Double sharp (talk) 05:32, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 November 2012

The Signpost: 26 November 2012

The Signpost: 03 December 2012

The Signpost: 10 December 2012

ITN for Romanian legislative election, 2012

--SpencerT♦C 00:13, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 December 2012

Forgot to say...

Thanks for the barnstar! Been a busy couple of days. Serendipodous 23:07, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Help Me (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2012

Speedy deletion nomination of Hollywood Post Alliance

A tag has been placed on Hollywood Post Alliance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, image description page, image talk page, mediawiki page, mediawiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, or user talk page from the article space.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DASHBot (talk) 18:15, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Your opinion needed

Hey there! A big discussion is being set up on the WP:ELEM talkpage (here) about renewing our goals. The current ones are not really followed. Accomplishing goals and striking them off the to do list could help make the project more active again. You're a very experienced active member: the discussion wouldn't be complete without you, so please take part. Thanks!--R8R Gtrs (talk) 15:49, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Nergaal,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Zirconium crystal bar and 1cm3 cube.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 29, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-12-29. —howcheng {chat} 17:37, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 starting soon

Hi there; you're receiving this message because you have previously shown interest in the WikiCup. This is just to remind you that the 2013 WikiCup will be starting on 1 January, and that signups will remain open throughout January. Old and new Wikipedians and WikiCup participants are warmly invited to take part in this year's competition. (Though, as a note to the more experienced participants, there have been a few small rules changes in the last few months.) If you have already signed up, let this be a reminder; you will receive a message with your submissions' page soon. Please direct any questions to the WikiCup talk page. Thanks! J Milburn 19:47, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nergaal/Archive_7&oldid=1142544221"