User talk:Neutral Fair Guy

Leave messages below the line. I answer back at your talk pages.

_________________________________________________________

March 2013

Hello, I'm C.Fred. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Ana Ivanovic seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Also make sure your changes are supported by reliable sources; I didn't see any sources in the article to indicate that Ivanovic has ever competed for Poland. —C.Fred (talk) 20:55, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Phrases like "not living in the real world" are inherently non-neutral and should be avoided, unless they're a direct quotation. —C.Fred (talk) 21:00, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 21:06, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 21:09, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you?

Which other account do you usually edit with? bobrayner (talk) 21:17, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 21:37, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]