User talk:Nicholasiswhoa

PPG air dates[edit]

Hi, I saw you recently added air dates to the table at List of The Powerpuff Girls episodes. While it's great that you're helping improve the article, please be sure to cite a reliable source for those particular dates. This isn't the case with every episode list, but there has been some controversy over which dates are correct (see Talk:List of The Powerpuff Girls episodes for more info). Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 21:08, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:V I have gone ahead and removed the dates, please provide a source, this has been a problem in the past with the article with people entering in original airdates as late as 2010. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:23, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Nicholasiswhoa/sandbox[edit]

User:Nicholasiswhoa/sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nicholasiswhoa/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Nicholasiswhoa/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 21:26, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects[edit]

You have twice blanked Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and turned it into an article draft. That's not what the page is for; rather, it's meant for requesting redirects. If you want to create a new article draft, please use the Article Wizard. Huon (talk) 02:56, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Chaofreaks1's Videos[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Chaofreaks1's Videos. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of Chao episodes. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of Chao episodes – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the page be "userfied" or emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Senator2029 ➔leave me a message 03:04, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your sandbox[edit]

Hi Nicholasiswhoa, if you haven't already taken a look at the deletion discussion for your sandbox, you may want to do so. If you want to write a list of your YouTube episodes, you'll have to make sure the channel meets our notability guidelines, especially WP:NWEB. You're perfectly welcome to use your sandbox for tests and formatting and such. If that's what you're doing, you should explain this at the deletion discussion. If you're using it to host what we call a WP:FAKEARTICLE, however, it will probably be deleted. I hope all this talk of deletion isn't scaring you off. Play by the rules and Wikipedia can be quite fun. You can reply here if you have any questions; I'll be watching. Best, BDD (talk) 20:38, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chao (season 1)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chao (season 1) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the page be "userfied" or emailed to you. ...William 00:26, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Chao episodes[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of Chao episodes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the page be "userfied" or emailed to you. BDD (talk) 00:46, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chao (season 2)[edit]

Hello Nicholasiswhoa,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Chao (season 2) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Clarkcj12 (talk) 03:28, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

NawlinWiki (talk) 13:14, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Sorry :( --Nicholasiswhoa (talk) 02:40, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nicholasiswhoa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Listen, I was just trying to help add release date, and add sentence in it. Also some people made mistakes, and I try to fix it, and I'm real sorry if I costs attack, or nonsense so I'll get off my account and never go back on Wikipedia.........forever :( Nicholasiswhoa (talk) 02:42, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your English is difficult to understand, but i believe you are saying that you intend to leave wikipedia. That being so, an unblock is not necessary. If you did not mean that, please post another unblock request addressing the reason for your block. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:01, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.