User talk:Nickpwarren

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

General sanctions alert[edit]

Please read this notice carefully.

You are receiving this notice because you recently edited one or more pages relating to blockchain or cryptocurrencies topics. You have not done anything wrong. We just want to alert you that "general" sanctions are authorized for certain types of edits to those pages.

A community decision has authorized the use of general sanctions for pages related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after the editor has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Retimuko (talk) 19:37, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Nickpwarren, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 14:30, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Corda[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Corda, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VVikingTalkEdits 14:45, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 20:56, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creating a thread or replying to it is not minor MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 20:56, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

R3 Corda and 1RR per GS/Crypto[edit]

You may wish to revert your last reversion - please see the 1 revert per 24 hours provision for crypto articles, as notified above.

Instead, this is literally under discussion on the talk page - David Gerard (talk) 15:26, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corda (decentralized database) (January 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Corda (decentralized database). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Robert McClenon (talk) 6:55 am, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Nickpwarren! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:55, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Corda is a major piece of software being used by huge institutions worldwide. All facts in this article are referenced to independent sources. It is therefore absolutely notable. As a proof point, another platform in Corda's peer group has its own Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperledger

Nickpwarren (talk) 15:02, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nickpwarren, I am afraid what you think does not matter. These notability policies were established by the community as a whole through consensus, and in order for your article to be accepted, it has to prove notability through those policies. "but xyzledger has a wikipedia page!" is not a proof of notability. --MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 15:07, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Moonythedwarf Ok then can you please explain which sources are causing the issue? As they are all independent. Or at least give me one example so I can make an informed edit. Thanks.Nickpwarren (talk) 15:10, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nickpwarren, I'm not a very good judge, so i'd recommend asking at the WP:HELPDESK. But, to me, it seems a lot like very few of these are independent, and are all press release with little independent content. But I will be honest, I did not spend nearly as much time reviewing the sources in this situation as your reviewer likely did. --MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 15:24, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Does the author of Draft:Corda (decentralized database) have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required declarations.

You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:02, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Corda (decentralized database) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Corda (decentralized database), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Corda (decentralized database)[edit]

Hello, Nickpwarren. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Corda".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:07, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nickpwarren&oldid=971201606"