User talk:Nickvelo

Automattik[edit]

A tag has been placed on Automattik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blowdart 20:34, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Hutchinson[edit]

Hello, Nickvelo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! BOVINEBOY2008 19:10, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Eric Hutchinson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Bacchus87 (talk) 19:14, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Eric Hutchinson. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Martin451 (talk) 19:17, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Hutchinson[edit]

Hi Nickvelo, I see you have been trying to change bio of Eric Hutchinson in place of his current article as you say this is requested by the artist. Even if this is the case, wikipedia needs to be neutral and sourced from independant sources ideally. I would request that you stop trying change the article in the same way. If you wish to add to or change the article please ensure that the changes are neural and well sourced. Hope that clears everything up. Bacchus87 (talk) 19:20, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi after looking at your last edit summary, I understand that reverting so quickly can be problematic. I'm sure you can understand that the into describing him as "the kind of guy you can trust" etc is not encylopedic and not neutral so I'm afraid that will get reverted if put up. I understand that if some of his chart data has changed then you wish to put it up but by including such a WP:POV intro it just gets reverted. Please make sure any edits you make are appropriate for an encylopedia and not biast in any way. Any questions please ask either here or on my talk page Bacchus87 (talk) 19:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I said in my two above comments the non POV nature of the intro, plus the repeated repeating of inserting your version without discussion other than telling me to get a life is what I consider to be Vandalism, the first time I understand which is why there is different grades of warnings, but after I explained why it should not be written in your way you still insist on changing it back. As for you saying your edit is correct, if you insert some references for the data you are changing then that would be fine, but otherwise the references we have stand. Bacchus87 (talk) 19:45, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Eric Hutchinson. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Martin451 (talk) 19:25, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Eric Hutchinson. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Martin451 (talk) 19:30, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Eric Hutchinson. Bacchus87 (talk) 19:39, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Administration Music Publishing for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Administration Music Publishing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Administration Music Publishing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. STATic message me! 20:11, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]