User talk:Nickyellow

Predicting renewals and pick-ups

Please refrain from adding your "predictions" for renewals and series pick-ups. We aren't a fan site, and we don't add user predictions. We go by the principle of verifiability. If you don't have a source that says a given show has been renewed, we wait until we do. While your predictions are fun to discuss over a beer, they have no place in an encyclopedia. --Drmargi (talk) 02:09, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

You have repeatedly been reverted and asked to refrain from making speculative edits. If it happens again, I will bring your behavior to the attention of an administrator. --Drmargi (talk) 02:09, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bennv3771. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Boy Band (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 12:28, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Your edits at Boy Band (TV series) have been restored as reliable sources were found and included. Thanks for your contributions. Bennv3771 (talk) 02:34, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nickyellow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not evading a series of long term blocks, i'm just doing my job for helping the encyclopediaNickyellow (talk) 19:47, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As below. Disregard the "second chance" comment on my previous unblock decline. Kuru (talk) 20:28, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reviewing admins - relevant comments here.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:09, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]