User talk:Nico7323104

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Nico7323104! I am Calaka and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Calaka (talk) 11:23, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Nico! That is fine. The first thing I did on Wikipedia is create an article for an item that I was trying to find more info for and I too was shocked to see that there was no article on it. So thank you for being bold. Also note that I moved the page to a new location since there is no need for quotation marks. Oh and don't worry, you will learn the ropes around Wikipedia soon enough.

Now re: the article itself, the references you have seem to be pointing to blogs a lot. The official website usually doesn't count (since there needs to be third party sources to indicate an article is notable (Wikipedia can not have 6 billion articles for every person in the world - only on those that are notable). Blogs are usually not a good source and Wikipedians and many readers alike would prefer references consisting of Magazines, reviews, newspaper articles, interviews, that kind of thing. But I see that you added a few extra references already so that might be just enough to cover it. But if you can find more publications that would make it even better and ensure the page remains! I hope this helped. Kind regards.Calaka (talk) 12:22, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Note this page: WP:OSE and you can see that you can't really use that as an argument (if you have a problem with other radio stations, then nominate them for deletion if you think they are not notable etc. etc.). Well yeah, I have no real concern with the article but others might and there might need to be more inforamtion about it backed up by other sources (blogs, youtube and the official website don't count). Can you find more information about the station in other newspapers, magazines, etc.? I had trouble finding them but I am sure you can find more. Sorry I could not help more but I hope it all works out. Please feel free to continue editing Wikipedia! Kind regards.Calaka (talk) 08:10, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the reason why: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Radio_Rainbow_International, though I am not sure why you were not notified of this (i.e. when someone puts an article for deletion, they usually send a message letting the creator know and give him a chance to defend the article). Please speak to the individual who nominated the page for deletion if you want more info behind why the article was deleted. Kind regards.Calaka (talk) 12:12, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Radio Caroline has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): (email address removed). It appears that you inserted an e-mail address to Radio Caroline. Wikipedia pages should not contain personal information. For more information, please read Wikipedia:Biography of Living People, specifically the section about personal information.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:46, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]