User talk:Nilsson23

Do you think that candice michelle is a worthy holder of the Womans Championship

David Wildsmith[edit]

A tag has been placed on David Wildsmith, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. P4k 08:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Bryan Strauchan. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. EH74DK 11:20, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Candice Michelle, you will be blocked from editing. Superbeecat 08:02, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Candice Michelle, you will be blocked from editing. - Deep Shadow 08:19, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Spartaz ^Humbug! 12:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Randy Orton. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Deep Shadow 09:20, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candice Michelle[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo 06:13, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About your message to Deep Shadow[edit]

About the message you left for Deep Shadow, user pages are not the appropriate place to leave messages. I have moved the comment to his Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 06:16, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You bagged me in the past? What did you say about me? :S Also you can check to see if an article has passed review on its talk page. In the case of Candice Michelle, it has not been nominated for good article status and even in its current state, it's unlikely to pass. - Deep Shadow 06:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but on the project's quality scale it is currently rated as B-Class. - Deep Shadow 08:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please don't post on my userpage. Post anything you have to say on my talk page and remember to sign. - Deep Shadow 08:17, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Power 25 is not notable. - Deep Shadow 09:37, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It means that it is not worthy of being added to the article. - Deep Shadow 09:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you're talking about. However, if you continue to vandalise articles and my userpage, it's only a matter of time before you are blocked again. You've been blocked numerous times already including on your other accounts. - Deep Shadow 02:33, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't emphasize this enough but stop posting on my user page. Leave comments on my talk page. I will delete your comments instead of moving them over until you learn.

Additionally, you can't tell people not to edit a page, like you just did to me. Everybody has an equal right to edit. - Deep Shadow 13:20, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, working on them so they upgrade from Start-Class to B-Class is ruining them. - Deep Shadow 05:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Deep Shadow, you will be blocked from editing. Stop trolling my page. Look at the article history. I haven't touched the moves list. Therefore, your posts on my page are nothing more than vandalism. The next time you post an untrue statement on any of my pages, I will report your actions. - Deep Shadow 10:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While you're learning how to do inline citations, you might also want to learn not to add things in the middle of references or on headings and how to sign your posts. - Deep Shadow 21:59, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to add it. Convention is to add moves if they have been performed more than once. She hasn't done it yet on RAW and she allegedly did it at a house show. - Deep Shadow 22:09, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We'll just have to wait and see then. - Deep Shadow 22:14, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Final Warnings.[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User:Nikki311, you will be blocked from editing.

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as in Talk:Candice Michelle, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.

You have been told by multiple users now to stop vandalising the Candice Michelle page, and you need to learn not to post on User pages, and to sign on Talk pages. These are you final warnings, change your behaviour or you will be blocked again. Darrenhusted 10:28, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

LessHeard vanU 12:39, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nilsson23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think i shouldent be blocked because after you told me to stop i did so what got me banned what article

Decline reason:

You got a final warning on July 9th and have continued vandalising since then. The block is entirely justified. — Yamla 21:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notability of Toyota Legendary Moments[edit]

A tag has been placed on Toyota Legendary Moments requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 11:41, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Toyota Legendary Moments[edit]

A tag has been placed on Toyota Legendary Moments requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 11:18, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candice Michelle[edit]

Please refrain from making edit like this one. You have been warned before on numerous occasions. Darrenhusted 15:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete notice[edit]

A tag has been placed on Toyota Legendary Moments, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Toyota Legendary Moments is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Toyota Legendary Moments saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. -- WebHamster 10:31, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candice Michelle under GA review[edit]

Hi there, I see that you are a primary contributor to the article Candice Michelle. This article has come under review for Good article reassessment as part of GA Sweeps and problem has been identified and listed on the talk page. Please begin to address this point in the next seven days or the article will be delisted from GA and will have to go through the GAN process all over again to regain its status once improvements have been made. If you have any questions, please drop me a line.--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:18, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]