User talk:Nimbipisa

April 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Eeekster. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Neumont University, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:15, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't intend to take the trouble right now to determine whether you are in fact a sock or simply a trouble maker. Either way, don't atack the article, even through the talk page, or you risk being blocked for disruptive editing..--Bbb23 (talk) 21:31, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Final warning. One more edit at the talk page like the last one, and I will block you.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 21:57, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nimbipisa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked by an admin who abused his power. He deleted sourced facts, censored talkpage--all because he has a COI. He/she was also very much involved. As such, I would ask for this to be taken to ARB com and his admin status immediately revoked Nimbipisa (talk) 22:03, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You in no way addressed the reasons for your block, instead choosing to falsely accuse the blocking admin who absolutely did the right thing. I'd recommend reading Guide to appealing blocks. Dreadstar ☥ 22:20, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

HAAAAHAAAAHAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --Nimbipisa (talk) 22:05, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the abuse here, I'm going to revoke your talk page access. Dreadstar ☥ 22:22, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]