User talk:Nimrodindia
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Nimrodindia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Rosiestep (talk) 02:43, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 5 September
[edit] Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Palindrome page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
NSEL SCAM
[edit]What kind of spamming is it? Please explain.
Let's not resolve to vandalism here. This page is biased and it's not required at all because there's already a page on NSEL and the scam should just be a subhead. Where's Wikipedia neutrality? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RZU1 (talk • contribs) 05:04, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Follow WP: Revert before undoing. Have tracked some your edits and you clearly have done a great job. Join in cleaning up the page. Do not let vandals mess it up. Johnsonwatts (talk) 05:09, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
STOP VANDALISM
[edit]The content is fact based so please stop removing them without any solid reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RZU1 (talk • contribs) 05:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
April 2016
[edit]![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history at NSEL scam shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jolly Ω Janner 04:25, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Sucheta Dalal
[edit]I see that you have been adding material to Sucheta Dalal such as this edit:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sucheta_Dalal&diff=prev&oldid=718104977
You have previously been warned about engaging in an edit war. Inclusion of material such as this requires careful wording to ensure that it is accurate and neutral, as well as solid sourcing to support any claims. Has a reference to attached it fails to be adequate in several ways. The source material appears to be a letter to the editor, which means it is not material published in the voice of the newspaper. In addition, the reference isn’t even to the newspaper that published the letter but appears to be a scan uploaded to some other service. The claim in your edit isn’t fully supported by the reference even if the reference were acceptable.
Because you’ve been warned about this issue in the past, if you attempt to add this material one more time in a manner inconsistent with our policies, you will be blocked.--S Philbrick(Talk) 14:24, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Nimrodindia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Nimrodindia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Nimrodindia. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Important Notice
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 15:49, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
March 2020 NSEL case
[edit] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to NSEL case, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted.
Please know, I'm not opposed to you deleting content for valid reasons, but you must provide those reasons when deleting well cited material. Thank you. GreaterPonce665 (talk) 16:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
New message from Abecedare
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 15:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Abecedare (talk) 15:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)