User talk:Ninevah

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! — User:ACupOfCoffee @ 06:40, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCookie

--Mikecraig 00:48, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Kavalee

Hiya..have a look at all the vandalism and reverts today on Ed Kavalee - boy am I sick of this!! --Mikecraig 23:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know, it's a pain in the proverbial. Suggest we ask for page protect? --Ninevah 23:29, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Age category

Hello! If you are receiving this message, that means that your user page is in a specific year category. Per a recent user-category per deletion, all specific year categories are to be deleted. If you wish to continue using year categories, you have two options:

Using an age group category, such as Category:Wikipedians in their 30s
Using a decade category, such as Category:Wikipedians born in the 1970s.

If you wish, you may do both. Hopefully, this change in categorization will be quick and painless. Happy editing! --An automated message from MessedRobot 12:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: Picture removal at My Turf War

I HAVE since seen the episode. The difference is that the picture spoils, WITHOUT A SPOILER WARNING. A picture is worth a thousand words, and if you are putting that picture at the top of the page then those words are rather blatant. Honestly, I don't think there is ever a good time for THAT picture. The spoiler warning exists for a reason. To quote Wikipedia:Spoiler warning

It is also recommended that editors avoid placing spoilers in edit summaries or section headers.

I could't find a specific mention of images on the page, but I think this fits as well as anything. Sure, the article should contain a pic, but I do not see the need for that picture depicting something that occurs in the last two minutes of the program and is rather important to the continuing narrative of Scrubs. WookMuff 09:58, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Re Mikecraig talk page, the reason they've survived in many cases is they haven't been nominated. The choices are to make the community aware of them or to nominate them yourself. They then get subjected to the same guidelines and tested against them. Orderinchaos 23:19, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is plenty more lists less "worthy" and "notable" that should be looked at for review. --Mikecraig 23:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne meetup 6

Hi. This is a reminder to people on the Melbourne meetup participation list that the next meetup has been arranged for 19 June. Could you indicate on the meetup page your likely attendence, or otherwise. Regards. - Cuddy Wifter 00:23, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Get This Guests

Do you feel "List of guest hosts on Get This" was deleted too quickly? No consensus was reached - what can be done about this? Gnangarra just decided to delete it, citing CRUFT - which is not a policy. Stu 02:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do feel that this was the case. However, there was some limited debate on a discussion page somewhere (can't think where - maybe articles for deletion or something like that) where most people seemed for for deleting. I was surprised that MikeCraig was for it, since he was the main contributer. --Ninevah 03:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was getting a bit tired of trying to justify things...the other page that was deleted was the notable events...etc for Get This and there was a few people to support but did not get enough people up to keep it. One thing I am finding is there is articles being deleted without any/very little notice without discussion (such as the ones in question here). --Mikecraig 03:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I thought that the list of Guest Hosts was fairly harmless. I thought there were far worse articles that exist that ought to be deleted - and continue to exist without debate - than this one. I don't have the time or effort required to fight a battle against somebody who has already decided what they're going to do. My gripe, that's life. --Ninevah 05:11, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with you there...one thing I am trying to do is to make articles "notable" and worthy of keeping. --Mikecraig 05:25, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Guest Host article was 1/2 for 1/2 against. Wikipedians shouldn't have to put up with 'bullies' clearing out reasonable articles as and when they feel like it. That information will be impossible to rebuild, should anyone want to. Stu 02:40, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Really? I thought it was more slanted towards the "against" pile. So - if what you're saying is true, Stu, what can be done about it? Who gets this kind of complaint? Can the decision be reversed? Anyone care to do it? --Ninevah 04:58, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

5 v 6 Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_guest_hosts_on_Get_This. I guess we can get it reversed - I believe pages go to a 'Recycle Bin' for a little while. Do you think it is worth it? Stu 02:52, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you've got the time, Stu, you can do it! :) --Ninevah 03:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Get this - redirect

I came across Get this article which had a suss redirect to Assembly of Albania. Caused confusion if you do a search for get this and instead of getting the Get This radio article you got the other - I have nominated for AfD, did you want to vote for delete also? --Mikecraig 01:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. Have voted for delete too. --Ninevah 02:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Lance & Anne Wilkinson

Lance was know as Lance Hails when he was first introduced and his father, Bill appeared periodically between 1995 and 1999.

When Lance became a full-time regular, Toadie (who'd not long been in the show) asked him he was part of the new Hails family. Lance answered that they were the Wilkinsons (opting to take Ruth's maiden name following her divorce from Bill). Hope this clears things up! Conquistador2k6 13:35 1 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Crowded House

Hi! A discussion has begun at WikiProject Crowded House's talk page regarding the future and goals of the WikiProject. Please feel free to contribute to this discussion in any way you see as being positive. --linca ^linca 10:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne Meetup

	Melbourne Meetup v t e Next: Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/46 - Tuesday 13 August, 2024 (watch) Last: 18 February 2023
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hello! The Melburnians are having another meet-up! Please consult this page if you are interested to participate in the discussion! Thanks! Phgao 03:29, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne meetup this Saturday

	Melbourne Meetup v t e Next: Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/46 - Tuesday 13 August, 2024 (watch) Last: 18 February 2023
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 16 Hope to see you there! JVbot (talk) 05:11, 20 July 2011 (UTC) (this automated message was delivered to all users at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/Participants)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, Ninevah. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Melbourne meetup

Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 04:51, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Ninevah! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 04:46, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26

Melbourne Meetup

Next: 6 January 2013 at La Trobe City Campus
Previous: 25 November 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 07:34, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!

WikiWomen - We need you!

Hi Ninevah! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more!

Get involved by:

Visiting our website for resources, events, and more
Meet other women and share your story in our profile space
Participate at and "like" our Facebook group
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel
Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering
Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience!

Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:33, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WWI WiR

Hi! Wikimedia Australia is initiating a World War I program with a call for a group of Wikimedians in Residence at GLAMs across Australia.

Please see wmau:Proposal:WWI WiR and signup before the end of this month to help us gauge numbers.

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Wikipedians in Australia and Female Wikipedians)

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Proposed deletion of Jason Stephens (film producer)

The article Jason Stephens (film producer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film producer. Founder of a non-notable company, winner of a very minor newspaper "award". Unrelated to the notable Jason Stephens (television producer)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 00:18, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]