User talk:Ninjakick121

Welcome

Hello Ninjakick121 and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to the page Dele Alli, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! JMHamo (talk) 13:19, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ninjakick121 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am extremely sorry for my rude and disruptive edits. I have read through your articles on the subject in detail and I can assure you it will not happen again.

Decline reason:

Under the circumstances, I'd be prepared to take a standard offer approach in your case. In this context, I suggest you make a new unblock request in 6 months. PhilKnight (talk) 09:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2015

Hello, I'm JMHamo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ollie Kearns because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! JMHamo (talk) 13:20, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arturo Vidal with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 15:10, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ollie Kearns, you may be blocked from editing. JMHamo (talk) 15:12, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ninjakick121 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Once again, I am truly sorry for the disruption and annoyance that I caused, I am very sure it will not happen again.

Decline reason:

Six months expires at the end of July. Incidentally, do try to remember to sign your talkpage posts. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ninjakick121 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My apologies for vandalising any pages and causing any disruption to the users, once again I am sorry Ninjakick121 (talk) 00:33, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

A checkuser done by Risker did not reveal any obvious signs of chicanery, and there does not appear to be any socks likely. On that count, I'm going to assume good faith. Per the standard offer, I will unblock you. I hope that you find Wikipedia a good hobby to have and a good place to be in. Meanwhile, I would strongly encourage you to do two things: learn the ropes by going through a tutorial program, "The Wikipedia Adventure", and to seek out a mentor at Wikipedia's Co-op program. Both, I believe, would benefit you as an editor, and the broader community as a whole. Now let's send this thing gently into that good night and hope for a brighter day tomorrow. Welcome back! ceradon (talk • edits) 03:14, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On hold: I'm awaiting a check user. --ceradon (talk • edits) 02:47, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ollie Kearns

added a link pointing to Football manager

Peter Kearns

added a link pointing to Relative

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Hollie Kearns

Hi, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. Ninjakick121, thanks for creating Hollie Kearns!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add additional references from reliable sources to the article to meet our verifiability and notablility requirements. Coverage for participating in a single event may not be enough for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:29, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hollie Kearns, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weymouth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:"Ollie Kearns 1986-1987 season.jpg".jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:"Ollie Kearns 1986-1987 season.jpg".jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. – Wdchk (talk) 02:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mick Kearns playing for the Republic of Ireland.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Mick Kearns playing for the Republic of Ireland.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Wdchk (talk) 03:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Peter Kearns.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Peter Kearns.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. – Wdchk (talk) 03:35, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Hollie Kearns with her granddad Peter Kearns.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hollie Kearns with her granddad Peter Kearns.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. – Wdchk (talk) 04:02, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hollie Kearns

The article Hollie Kearns has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability guideline (people) WP:BIO. Subject is known for one event only, and that event is non-notable (a minor fund-raising activity). Self-published source and one local news item publicizing that event. Being related to a notable person does not confer notability upon this person. Searched for, and unable to find, further sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Wdchk (talk) 19:48, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Yevhen Konoplyanka. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 02:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you removed some content without explanation from the article Ollie Kearns, and in the process broke some of the wiki markup. I see that you have been blocked from editing previously, and in your unblock requests you assured us that "it will not happen again". While it is appropriate under the policy on biographies of living persons to remove contentious content that is poorly sourced, in the light of your editing history any content you remove without a valid explanation is likely to receive scrutiny. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. – Wdchk (talk) 12:40, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at ninjakick121's talk page. I see no reason as to why I cannot remove poorly sourced information off a page, isn't that one of the main points of editing anyway? Also, the information I deleted I had put on their myself, and in trying to correct it the potentially misleading and very personal information is constantly put back on there. I am only trying to fix a mistake I made, please let me.

May 2016

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Atheism, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 17:57, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alice Perrers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anne O'Brien. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously so please do not add any image unless you have the right to use them. Qed237 (talk) 17:58, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First of all I doubt that you have taken the images yourself with your own camera. For example the image for Sasa Zdjelar is found in a quick google search at player profile at UEFA. The same goes for this image that also is found here. Secondly, only because you uploaded them does not mean that they have been accepted at commons. Have you really taken them with your own camera? Qed237 (talk) 18:18, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I genuinely have taken all photos with my own camera. You cannot remove photos just because you 'think' someone hasn't taken a photo without any proof to back up your statement. Ninjakick121 (talk) 18:23, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So how do you explain the image being used on various places? Qed237 (talk) 18:25, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All photos that I take are labelled for reuse across the internet for commercial and modified usage. Photography is a hobby for me, not a profession so I have no problem in allowing the public to use my photos where they please. Ninjakick121 (talk) 18:29, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I believe you. I am sorry if I am giving you a hard time, it is just an area where wikipedia is very strict and it happens very often that editors take any image they can find, and then claim it as their own. I can honestly say that images are not my area of expertice so I am trying to find an editor who is more familiar with this. Qed237 (talk) 18:38, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do not be sorry, it is completely understandable you are just trying to comply with Wikipedia rules. I know that the regulations on images are strict and they should be as violating copyrights with images is very easy to do on the internet. I am glad that we have come to a peaceful conclusion. Thanks Ninjakick121 (talk) 18:46, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We need to have some evidence that you are the photographer of such previously published images. Are you perchance a photographer for hire? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ninjakick121. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ninjakick121. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:47, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ninjakick121. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]