User talk:Nipnipnip

May 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ramblin' Wreck, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ramblin' Wreck was changed by Nipnipnip (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-05-15T16:59:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Ramblin' Wreck. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 17:01, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Ramblin' Wreck. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 17:02, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 17:04, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What can i say about this?[edit]

I'm deeply sorry for my sisters ignorance towards Wikipedia. She was editing all that info. Again I am oh so deeply sorry for those unfortunate remarks and I PROMISE it won't happen again. If it happens again I give you permission to ban me b/c it won't happen again i promise okay? does that sound like a good deal. one more time.... i'm so so so so sorry for my sisters actions. i will go punish her now and tell her to never do it again. again... i'm sorry. please forgive me and my sisters actions. do you forgive me? thanks if you do. and if you don't forgive me please tell me why and i will fix it i promise. again, i'm so sorry. it will never happen again. i apologize. take care EXCIRIAL! i'm happy you are taking care of your awesome site! again i'm sorry! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nipnipnip (talk • contribs) 17:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

did you get my last message? i really hope you did b/c im sooooooo sorry. it will never happen again. i want to punish my sister severely right now, but that is illegal so i won't. again sorry and let me know if you get these messages. thanks again. thank you!

In all honesty i don't really mind who does the vandalism - as long as it stops i am happy with it :). Also, need need to apologize like that; Vandalism is taken care of very efficiently around here, and no permanent harm was done. Again, if its stops, its A-OK. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 17:20, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:21, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh[edit]

There are no black dots...--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 17:30, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 31 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Menti fisto 17:31, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nipnipnip (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I researched that man. i did a project on him last year!!!!!! he was a good and quick learner! this is not fair. i am trying to help the wikipedia community out my spreading my wealth of knowledge and u try to ban me b/c i have difficulty in life. please unban me. it was a good fact that could be used in many future reports.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:14, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We... do not care, if you, researched the man. Your edits are good intentioned but that isn't the only reason, your "sisters" past edits mean we won't trust you, you need SOURCES for us ot accept it.--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 17:36, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FUCK MY LIFEEEEEEEEE! ur so mean!

CAN YOU AT LEAST BRING THE BAN DOWN TO 27 HOURS AND 89 MINUTES? I LEAVE FOR MY GMA'S HOUSE SOON AND I WANT TO BE ABLE TO POST WHEN SHE SEES ME

OK... I'm trying to be nice, but rules, are rules. Also, in case you didn't know, the World is a mean place--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 17:40, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

well presdients of website r suppose to be nice. ur not! i will tell pres. george w boosh about u. he'll get you banned for banning me for doing nothing.

i dont like hitler

Ok... I could go and explain WHY what you jsut said was wrong, but i don't feel like it nor do I have time. Also... apparently you've been MIA for the past... what, 7 months? Bush ain't president.--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 17:45, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]