User talk:Niwi3/Archive 3
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your GA nomination of Mass Effect 2: Kasumi - Stolen Memory
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Mass Effect 2: Kasumi - Stolen Memory you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:58, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mass Effect 2: Kasumi - Stolen Memory
The article Mass Effect 2: Kasumi - Stolen Memory you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Mass Effect 2: Kasumi - Stolen Memory for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:00, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
|
The Good Article Barnstar | |
| For your contributions to bring Mass Effect 2: Kasumi - Stolen Memory to Good Article status. Your work on Mass Effect topics has been amazing! -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:04, 7 August 2013 (UTC) |
Have you looked into making Mass Effect 2 a Good topic at some point? Seems like you'd have to be close to there with all the work you've done! -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:04, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Have you looked into making Mass Effect 2 a Good topic at some point? Seems like you'd have to be close to there with all the work you've done! -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:04, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for the barnstar! Yeah, I've already thought about that, but its scope is somewhat unclear to me; some "major" DLCs like Zaeed - The Price of Revenge or Firewalker are not as notable as the ones I created, and I don't know whether they deserve their own articles or not. But I guess I still have to figure it out. In any case, my next project will be Dig Me Out. It's one of my favorite albums and I've always wanted to improve it since I joined Wikipedia. Now, I think I have found enough sources to promote it to GA status. Wish me luck, and thank you for your interest :) --Niwi3 (talk) 18:52, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Joanna Dark XBOX.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Joanna Dark XBOX.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:24, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Dig Me Out
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dig Me Out you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Вик Ретлхед -- Вик Ретлхед (talk) 08:15, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Dig Me Out
The article Dig Me Out you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Dig Me Out for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Вик Ретлхед -- Вик Ретлхед (talk) 10:45, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- Posted you an answer on the album's talk page. Cheers.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 13:33, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- I almost forgot to ask you this. Can you split "During the recording sessions, recording the vocal interplay between Tucker and co-vocalist and guitarist Carrie Brownstein involved some difficulties and care was taken to prevent favoring one voice over the other."? Did the producer took care of the problem? If so, can you transform it like this: "During the recording sessions, recording the vocal interplay between Tucker and co-vocalist and guitarist Carrie Brownstein involved some difficulties. However, the producer took care and prevented favoring one voice over the other." Sorry to ask this now, but it totally slipped out of my mind. I think it sounds better the second way.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 17:09, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- Just one more. Did you check if the record charted in some other countries besides the US?--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 17:27, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- I almost forgot to ask you this. Can you split "During the recording sessions, recording the vocal interplay between Tucker and co-vocalist and guitarist Carrie Brownstein involved some difficulties and care was taken to prevent favoring one voice over the other."? Did the producer took care of the problem? If so, can you transform it like this: "During the recording sessions, recording the vocal interplay between Tucker and co-vocalist and guitarist Carrie Brownstein involved some difficulties. However, the producer took care and prevented favoring one voice over the other." Sorry to ask this now, but it totally slipped out of my mind. I think it sounds better the second way.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 17:09, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Let's finish this review.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 18:10, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The WikiProject Albums Barnstar | |
| Here's an award as a recognition for your job on the Dig Me Out article. Unfortunately, we'll have to wait a certain period before promoting the album to GA class, but the community decision won't affect the album's status. Again, great work and rock on.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 16:40, 31 August 2013 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Dig Me Out
The article Dig Me Out you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dig Me Out for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Вик Ретлхед -- Вик Ретлхед (talk) 18:27, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, October 2013
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue 
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2013, the project has:
|
Content
|
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2013
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2013, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 11:10, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Template:Video game multiple platforms reviews has been nominated for merging with Template:Video game reviews. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Cky2250 (talk) 18:07, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Ghost in the Shell (video game)
Did you fail Ghost in the Shell (video game) in less than 3 hours before I even had a chance to address the most basic of issues? Hold is good for 7 days and most of the issues you pointed out were things that are already fixed or were just a slight blip by Niemti's copy editing. Can you please respond to it. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 23:26, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Hot Rock (album)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Hot Rock (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Idiotchalk -- Idiotchalk (talk) 22:30, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Hot Rock (album)
The article The Hot Rock (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:The Hot Rock (album) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Idiotchalk -- Idiotchalk (talk) 02:30, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Hot Rock (album)
The article The Hot Rock (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Hot Rock (album) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Idiotchalk -- Idiotchalk (talk) 21:12, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
ProtoGalaxy
Hi Niwi,
Considering that you were the good article reviewer for the ProtoGalaxy article, I thought that you might be interested to know that I have submitted the article for a featured article candidacy here. Any constructive comments you are willing to provide there would be greatly appreciated.
Neelix (talk) 19:27, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Quarter 4, 2013
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2013, the project has:
|
Content
|
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Descent 3 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 14:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
The article Descent 3 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Descent 3 for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 11:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2014
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2014
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2014, the project has:
|
Content
|
Soliciting comment...
Hi! Would you care to review or comment at my FA nomination for the article Marquee Moon? Since you last reviewed it, I've expanded and changed it pretty significantly, and would be interested in your comments on whether it meets FA criteria. If not , feel free to ignore this message. Dan56 (talk) 07:46, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2014
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2014
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2014, the project has:
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Input at FAC
Hello Niwi. Are you currently able to do a review on Thirteen, an FA candidate of a friend of mine? You can leave comments at the review page. Appreciate your time.--Retrohead (talk) 10:35, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- Hey Niwi, can you reply whether you intend to leave feedback on the nomination, or should I contact another editor? If you're busy or have other priorities, I understand.--Retrohead (talk) 07:13, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Why delete?
Hi Niwi3, I see you deleted my paragraph on the plot of Mass Effect 2. Can I ask why? Arrival is a part of Mass Effect 2, just as much as any other misson in the game regardless of whether it was DLC or not. Since you edited the page, I assume you have played the Mass Effect games. Then you should know how important Arrival is to the trilogy. Mass Effect 3 begins with Shepard on front of the Alliance on Earth as a result of the events of Arrival. The aim the plot paragraph is to describe the plot of Mass Effect 2, obviously other DLCs like Firewalker or Overlord can be omitted because they are subplots to the main stream of events, but Arrival is different. Its consequences to the plot of 2 and the trilogy as a whole are so important that the game development even included an alternate ending to Arrival where the entire galaxy is destroyed by the Reapers! Considering its significance to the trilogy, does it not deserve even four lines at the end of the plot? This by no means takes away from the description of game, but instead gives the reader a better understanding of the story of Mass Effect 2 and makes the bridge between it and 3. I hope you can see where I am coming from. Thanks, The Free Editor Anyone Can Cite (talk) 15:00, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black Eye (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fluffy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Washing Machine (album)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washing Machine (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sparklism -- Sparklism (talk) 14:40, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Washing Machine (album)
The article Washing Machine (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washing Machine (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sparklism -- Sparklism (talk) 20:42, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- That's gotta be a great feeling - well done for all your hard work! And you made me dig it out and listen to it again too, so thanks for that :) — sparklism hey! 20:49, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Resident Evil: Revelations
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Resident Evil: Revelations you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 22:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Resident Evil: Revelations
The article Resident Evil: Revelations you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Resident Evil: Revelations for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 20:22, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Black Eye (album)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Black Eye (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sparklism -- Sparklism (talk) 09:01, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Black Eye (album)
The article Black Eye (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Black Eye (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sparklism -- Sparklism (talk) 15:22, 6 December 2014 (UTC)