User talk:Nkupad

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nkupad. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Bhanu Pratap Sharma moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bhanu Pratap Sharma, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering^(t) 16:26, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Anu Malik, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Three different editors have reverted your attempted white-washing of the article. Stop. Discuss it on the article talk page, but you need to stop removing it from the article until you get consensus. You're conducting a slow edit-war over this, and you can end up blocked if you continue. Ravensfire (talk) 21:57, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Minor should really only be used for edits that correct spelling, grammar or things that aren't visible on the screen. Ravensfire (talk) 16:36, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Talk page posts

I appreciate you at least leaving a post on my talk page, but please remember to sign your posts by adding ~~~~ at the end which adds the date and who left the message at the end. Depending on what you are using to edit the page, there may be a button that will add the tildes for you. Discussions on articles really should be on the article talk pages though. Thanks. Ravensfire (talk) 19:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Anu Malik. bonadea contributions talk 15:55, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Nkupad - please read the dispute resolution page for some suggestions on how to resolve the dispute. While you are participating some on the talk page, you need to work more there and less on the article until there is some consensus on the talk page for making an edit. There are some optional places to raise the discussion mentioned there (and on the talk page discussion as well!) that you might consider. Continuing to just blank out the section and ignore everyone else is not a good thing and will end up with you blocked from editing. Ravensfire (talk) 18:53, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Anu Malik, you may be blocked from editing. This is a BLP. Be more careful. Drmies (talk) 16:58, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Anu Malik. bonadea contributions talk 17:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)