User talk:No-life1231
request[edit]
No-life1231 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The reason I reverted the edit on GMD or whatever, was because I just saw a massive bit decrease and so I thought they were deleting things for no reason. I didn't check the editing reason, that was on my part. I had no intention of vandalism on this site. And why was my sandbox being put up for "speedy deletion"? I thought your sandbox was to test out wikicode and things like that.No-life1231 (talk) 22:27, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
It's rather difficult to see the difference in size without also seeing the edit summary that explains it. And that does not explain edits like this or this. Huon (talk) 00:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
request[edit]
No-life1231 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Seriously? A simple mistake would leave me permanently blocked. Honestly, if this entire Wikipedia community is as toxic as you admins are, I don't even see the point in making an edit. Instead of trying to help out, like a good administrator should, I get blocked. Huh, what abuse? I want to hear your nerdy, shitty refute to this. Nice way to welcome new members to the community, asshole. No-life1231 (talk) 00:35, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- (Non-administrator comment) If this, this and this are examples of what you have to offer the project, I think we are in total agreement with you that there's no real point in your editing Wikipedia any further. Thanks. General Ization Talk 00:42, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
No-life1231 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'll say it again. It might seem like some random coincidence and that I am obviously lying, but I made the mistake of thinking I was in SANDBOX mode when I made those edits. No-life1231 (talk) 00:58, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There is no such thing as sandbox "mode". You have a sandbox page, which you have edited once. You will have seen in doing so, that the page is headed with your name and "Sandbox" in big letters. You have not seen that anywhere else. I cannot accept that in going to an article, or another user's talk page, you could possibly have believed yourself to be on your sandbox page. To be considered for unblock you will need to address your inappropriate edits more directly. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:42, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
No-life1231 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Look, I am sorry, ok? I promise I will not vandalize wikipedia as I did. I was unaware how to add unsourced material, and was also unaware that adding unsourced material was considered vandalism. I will try to be much more careful with my edits/reverts. I will source my edits next time. Please consider this for an unblock. No-life1231 (talk) 21:59, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I was going to decline this unblock request, but decided to hold off. You've done a fair amount of blatant and deliberate vandalism, but your unblock request implies the problem was unsourced material. That's a part of the problem, but another part is your outright and obviously deliberate vandalism. You address this only in passing: "I promise I will not vandalize wikipedia as I did." I'd strongly urge you elaborate on this. --Yamla (talk) 22:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
I will not vandalize wikipedia at all, anymore, in any way. Sorry, I am not usually good at getting my point across. Yes, I know I did some blatant vandalism, but looking back I see the acts as childish. I already earned a bad reputation, so I would like to start fresh. No-life1231 (talk) 22:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
No-life1231 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was going to decline this unblock request, but decided to hold off. You've done a fair amount of blatant and deliberate vandalism, but your unblock request implies the problem was unsourced material. That's a part of the problem, but another part is your outright and obviously deliberate vandalism. You address this only in passing: "I promise I will not vandalize wikipedia as I did." I'd strongly urge you elaborate on this. --Yamla (talk) 22:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
I will not vandalize wikipedia at all, anymore, in any way. Sorry, I am not usually good at getting my point across. Yes, I know I did some blatant vandalism, but looking back I see the acts as childish. I already earned a bad reputation, so I would like to start fresh. No-life1231 (talk) 22:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline - no response to question in over 3 days. PhilKnight (talk) 00:16, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.