User talk:No sense of humour

This is No sense of humour's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Jonathan C. Knight has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jonathan C. Knight. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:36, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan C. Knight (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thegooduser was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonathan C. Knight and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jonathan C. Knight, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 23:21, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, No sense of humour! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 23:21, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan C. Knight (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mgbo120 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still requires more news-related references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonathan C. Knight and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jonathan C. Knight, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 09:57, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi No sense of humour -- I've accepted this draft; you can find it at Jonathan C. Knight. I'm not sure why the latest version was rejected; the subject is obviously notable and the sourcing appears adequate. It could do with some more sources -- ideally all information in the biography of a living person should have an inline citation to a reliable source, but for non-contentious material (such as education) it's acceptable to use the subject's own university profile as a source. Espresso Addict (talk) 19:27, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel encouraged to contribute articles on similar academics! Now that you have autoconfirmed status, you need not submit them to the Articles for Creation service. Note that all articles about living people must have reliable, independent references present from the start, and you might like to develop your articles in your own user space sandbox until you feel they are ready for publication. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 19:37, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message on my talk page: My pleasure! There's no direct messaging system -- it's fine just to leave thanks messages on people's talk pages, but you can also use the "thank" link in the page history if you want to be a bit more subtle. Happy editing! Espresso Addict (talk) 12:07, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hyper Rayleigh Scattering Optical Activity has been accepted

Hyper Rayleigh Scattering Optical Activity, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 01:22, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue at David L. Andrews

Hello No sense of humour, your recent article David L. Andrews contained a section which was copied outright from a website of the University of East Anglia. I have removed the content in question since Wikipedia may not host material that has been copied without the explicit consent of the copyright holder. In the future, Please remember to summarise sources in your own words. Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 20:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No sense of humour: duly noted!