Jump to content

User talk:Nonbankfiddle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is my first direct communication with another Wikipedian. Thanks for your mediation. I thought that the other parties were being disingenuous towards a constructive, if somewhat obfuscative and obscure argument. I will continue to expand and clarify the argument in the future.

I have not read Enders Game. I will link to it and read about it, and let you know what I think. I am not as dedicated to Wikipedia as many other full-time Wikipedians are. But I gather enormous amounts of information from it, and have begun to notice that it is the most important human knowledge repository in human history, and probably will continue to be so for quite a long time. I value it beyond the encyclopedic content; I value it for its implications. I'll get back to you with more later. Thanks for the dialogue.


I'm copying and pasting what i had to say on this whole discussion that started in the policy section of the village pump... let me know if you're still interested in any of it:

yar. since we're looking wikipedia possibly being a paradigm for something greater, why not relate it to history? it seems that empires, religions, political theories and pretty much any other feasible coalition of humans starts off with a vision, which then grows in popularity, but always eventually becomes corrupt, bureaucratic and functioning on the letter of the law rather than the spirit of its original creation. religions are probably the best example of this... positively spreading the enlightenment of the founder in order to enhance people's spiritual outlooks eventually turns into institutionalized regimes that ignorantly function on irrelevant customs and beliefs. it is safe to assume that wikipedia has or will at some point reach this turning point. but its policies of consensus and democracy are some of the greatest in history; if it were a country it would be close to a utopia. so why not see what happens when some human-made thing reaches this point but DOESN'T fall burning to the ground? in order to proceed where everything else has fallen, adaptation must become a priority. i'm not exactly sure where i'm going... i didn't get enough sleep last night... does this make any sense?

Lord mortekai 02:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Given your interests...[edit]

You just may find this interesting. ;)

See: http://www.the16types.info/forums/viewtopic.php?t=11079 http://www.the16types.info/forums/viewtopic.php?t=15627 , http://www.the16types.info/forums/viewtopic.php?t=13766 , http://www.the16types.info/forums/viewtopic.php?t=15892 , http://www.the16types.info/forums/viewtopic.php?t=13611 , http://www.the16types.info/forums/viewtopic.php?t=15243

Tcaudilllg (talk) 13:23, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]