User talk:NoobServer625

NoobServer625, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi NoobServer625! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

February 2021

Hello, I'm UncleBubba. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Ellen DeGeneres, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 05:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

NoobServer625: Bite me

Wow. Eloquent. Your command of the language is admirable, as is your exceptional talent for cooperating and communicating with others. I won't even mention your stellar ability to read instructions and follow conventions (like upon which Talk page to post a reply). — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 05:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

March 21

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Slatersteven (talk)

You need to make a case at talk.Slatersteven (talk) 12:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Ng Chee Meng

Hello NoobServer625. Please do respond on Talk:Ng_Chee_Meng#Lede_text and let's discuss how to resolve the sentence, which I feel is structurally wrong. If we are unable to come to a consensus, I will gladly seek dispute resolution with neutral editors and hopefully arrive at a compromise. Thank you. As you have not left any edit summaries, I am unable to parse your reasoning for your edits, and can't respond accordingly. Would you prefer to involve a third party opinion immediately? Seloloving (talk) 11:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Hello, I'm Denniss. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Eastern Front (World War II) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Denniss (talk) 13:07, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rush Limbaugh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 05:34, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at David Clarke (sheriff). Larry Hockett (Talk) 12:50, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:49, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Important additional notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:50, 11 April 2021 (UTC)