User talk:Noor.leghari

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Noor.leghari, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Lova Falk talk 08:41, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Source[edit]

Hi Noor.leghari! Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your edit of Behavioural genetics. You stated a source: Plomin, Robert (09 1989). THE JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE. 177. pp. 645. However, you forgot to mention the name of the article that Plomin wrote, and I cannot find an article of Plomen in this journal in 1989. Could you please complete with the name of the article? If you don't know how to fix this, you can ask me for help. With friendly regards, Lova Falk talk 07:55, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Once more, please add the name of the article. Lova Falk talk 21:04, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the title of the abstract, it's not an article. The reference is wrong (issue 10, not 9). I corrected this, but Noor just reverted all changes. Noor: I did a lot of work on that article and you cannot just revert all that without giving any justification. This time, I retained your statement and "reference", because both you and Lova seem to insist that this belongs in the article. However, I have reworded it to be more general (the article is about all of BG, not just human BG) and placed it at a more appropriate spot (a lead should actually not have references (see WP:LEAD), those should be in the body of the article. Of course, it's rather inappropiate to source some statement to something that is just an abstract. Plomin has published hundreds of articles and several books, so there must be better references for this statement. Now if you still disagree with any of my edits, please explain that on the talkpage and do not perform a wholesale revert that erases lots of valid corrections (to your "reference" as well as to the text of the rest of the article). Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 10:05, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]