User talk:Nordnik

The article User:Nordnik has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nordnik[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Nordnik, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WuhWuzDat 04:10, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paste.com[edit]

Get a paste.com account. You can put any text files (includes XML and wikipedia stuff -- like what I am typing here) you want there without anyone deleting them for advertising. Azemocram (talk) 07:46, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

deletion[edit]

Unfortunately, user pages are often abused as a vehicle for spam. Your highly promotional advertisement for your charity is no exception Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the article here for the time being. Comments to follow very soon. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:15, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there a spamlink right after the opening Charity Checks? - org's website should be an external link
is the nonprofit organization... no sources for any of this paragraph which claims uniqueness, and also says donors who give them as gifts know that the money will be used to benefit a charity unsourced claim
to Give the Joy of Giving more directly. syrupy slogan, non-enc
501(c)(3) charity OK in principle but meaningless to non-US citizens
History. Para 1 is unsourced
The pilot test was a success... unsourced spammy claim
Uses of Giving Certificates consumers generated a myriad of new uses for them. unsourced spammy claim. Why is it all capitalised?
An Alternative to Commercial Gifts Why is it all capitalised? Why does an encyclopaedia have a section with this title?
which makes it possible to Give the Joy of Giving sloganising again
This made Giving Certificates a popular choice among people evidence
The Washington Post etc refs are fine, but one-sided. Has there never been any criticism of this scheme. Remember you need balance.
Pre-Paid Philanthropy First paragraph makes a string of unsourced claims eg Some donors use... these people donate it all to Charity Checks at the end of December, fully intending to use the Giving Certificates themselves during the coming year. Evidence?
Furthermore, because they already have their receipt in-hand, they can make donations anonymously, thereby keeping their names off annoying mailing and call lists. Evidence?
Philanthropy With Training Wheels Some families report using Giving Certificates to train their children... pure unsourced or WP:OR spam
The prestigious Harvard-Westlake School evidence for claim

Your hidden comment suggests that you do not take on board the purpose of Wikipedia. It is not to "memoralise" a charity, it is not the charity's page, it is not your page, it is an encyclopaedia. I know some charities think they can ignore the rules because they are non-commercial, and indeed some suspect stuff slips through, but this is an encyclopaedia. My comment yesterday was brusque, and I apologise for that, I was in a rush. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:44, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, I've formatted the LA Times ref to show you how it should be done to look more professional Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:51, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nordnik/sandbox[edit]

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on User:Nordnik/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]