User talk:Nordosm

Hello, Nordosm, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Snowysusan (talk) 10:06, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Karl-Hermann Geib: article

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Karl-Hermann Geib, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Go Phightins! 21:37, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karl-Hermann Geib (February 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

Improve the references in order to show his notability. Two of the references cannot be displayed. One of the references is to Wikipedia, which is not acceptable; turn it into a See also if needed. Three of the references are to his own work. Focus on what others have said about him, not what he has said.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karl-Hermann Geib and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nordosm, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karl-Hermann Geib for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karl-Hermann Geib is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karl-Hermann Geib until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nordosm: The Karl-Hermann Geib article is no longer being considered for deletion and has been kept. All the best. Picomtn (talk) 14:54, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please learn to use the "new section" button for talk pages[edit]

Your recent edit [here] resulted in your comments being "merged" into another unrelated discussion. I fixed the problem but the way to avoid that is to use the "new discussion" link at the top of the page to start new topics. For more information on this and other talk page functions and etiquette please see Wikipedia:Tutorial/Talk pages. Koala Tea Of Mercy (KTOM's Articulations & Invigilations) 07:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Fritz Johann Hansgirg[edit]

Hi @Nordosm: The first place you should go for information about Dr. Fritz Johann Hansgirg is at the Public Education Center^[1], be sure to read the whole report as it details his jailing by the US, his wife's plea to J. Edgar Hoover, and much, much more. Next, go to this Academia.edu report^[2]. Between the two of these, especially the references they cite, there is more than enough information for you to write this article about him, and which he deserves. Hope this helps. Picomtn (talk) 11:29, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Help me too?[edit]

Hi @Nordosm: If you were the creator for the article on Гейб, Карл-Германн^[1], and since you appear to have, like me, a penchant (a strong or habitual liking for something or tendency to do something) for acknowledging obscure persons who have been, or are being, marginalized--would you care to give me your thoughts/opinions of Draft:Sorcha Faal? There are too many Russian language links related to this subject for to go through, and some are included in this article. I also believe that Russian Wikipedia users would be more sympathetic to this article than Americans are and would appreciate your thoughts on that subject too. Let me know. Picomtn (talk) 11:49, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%93%D0%B5%D0%B9%D0%B1,_%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BB-%D0%93%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD

Sorcha Faal[edit]

Hi @Picomtn: OK. I already tried Wikipedia beta translator for the translation of your Sorcha Faal. Translation from English into Russian for me quite a different matter than vice versa. Nordosm (talk) 13:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Сорча Фаал (April 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The submission appears to be written in Russian. This is the English Language Wikipedia; we can only accept articles written in the English Language. Please provide a high-quality English Language translation of your submission. Otherwise, you may write it in the Russian Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft appears to be in the Cyrilic alphabet. It may be in Russian, or in some other East Slavic language, or South Slavic language that is written in the Cyrillic alphabet.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nordosm/sandbox/Draft:Сорча Фаал and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 13:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Robert McClenon: I opened a page on the Russian Wikipedia:ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Участник:Farfara/Песочница. Thanks. Nordosm (talk) 04:53, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Сорча Фаал[edit]

Hello, Nordosm. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Сорча Фаал".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 03:46, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Karl-Hermann Geib has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Karl-Hermann Geib. Thanks! Boson (talk) 19:14, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Karl-Hermann Geib concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Karl-Hermann Geib, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Karl-Hermann Geib[edit]

Hello, Nordosm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Karl-Hermann Geib".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.dcbureau.org/201306258778/national-security-news-service/hungnam-north-korea-delving-into-pyongyangs-long-nuclear-past.html

[2] ttp://www.academia.edu/7850196/1945_When_Korea_Faced_Its_Post-Colonial_Future

[3] ttps://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%93%D0%B5%D0%B9%D0%B1,_%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BB-%D0%93%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD

[1]

[2]

[1]