User talk:Normiehater

Normiehater, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Normiehater! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Hello, I'm MelecieDiancie. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chokha, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. •Melecie!• ~talk~ 10:36, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

You have insulted me by calling me hypocrite, which is not a good thing, i advice you to never repeat it, we are both Caucasians as it seems and we both know how much our honor means to us. Most of the Russian sources and historians are biased and political everyone knows it so please provide sources better than them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemabeta (talk • contribs) 18:04, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

If you care about honor so much then revert my changes, I provided enough links to prove that you're wrong. If you dont do that there is no point in talking with you as you are a hypocrite and also a very petty ethnocentrist. Cherkeska is an outfit that belongs to people of the Caucasus and is a symbol of oppression and fight for freedom. If you can't respect that then you're the one in wrong.

Most russian sources are biased? Against who? Georgians? Theyre biased against turks and other caucasians as well, and yet they have many historians with more credibility than you and your georgian articles that are more unbiased. Literally no one except for Georgians think it's Georgian, just take a look at the talk page. Besides, russians have made much more research on this area than any other western researcher ever could. And who did you think is unbiased? Your vogue article paid by Georgians? Other articles written by Georgians? Your external links in Georgian? You don't even want to compromise, you reverted everything back and added an imeriti pic in the front just to make sure people would think its georgian, that photograph you added is serving nothing except maybe ruining the page's looks and aesthetic. one photo of a man in chokha and papakha was enough. I deleted the photo and some other sentences, I ask you to see the page and let me know what you think, please do not to continue reverting my changes back to all Georgian. lets keep the page inclusive. EDIT: wanted to add that its best not to make claims about the origins as i see a lot of people have been complaining about it on the talk page. Normiehater (talk) 05:29, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Chokha. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

•Melecie!• ~talk~ 05:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hello, I'm ზურა6446. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.

Consider yourself warned 🙂 ზურა 6446 21:55, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Oh and how did it not appear constructive?:) was it not georgian enough? Normiehater (talk) 07:41, 14 May 2021 (UTC)