User talk:Norozco1

Welcome[edit]

Hello Norozco1, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Norozco1, good luck, and have fun. – Aboutmovies (talk) 14:41, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Gogo Dodo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brianne Siddall because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:32, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Gogo Dodo. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk) 03:54, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: the deletion of Brianne Siddall, big mistake! >:([edit]

Re your message: I did not delete the page, so you are complaining to the wrong admin. I only reverted your attempted undoing of the closure of the deletion discussion, which did nothing to restore the article. If you disagree with the closure of the deletion discussion, please discuss the issue with Spartaz (talk · contribs) or follow the instructions at Deletion Review, though you must discuss the issue with Spartaz first. However, I will tell you right now that making threats of retaliation will not get the decision reversed. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:54, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Debi Derryberry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jekyll. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Bishonen | talk 17:43, 6 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brianne Siddall (July 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Brianne Siddall.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Revent^talk 21:30, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Norozco1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Revent^talk 21:30, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Queen's Blade characters

added a link pointing to Elizabeth Williams

Pokémon the Movie: Genesect and the Legend Awakened

added a link pointing to Marc Thompson

Sarah Natochenny

added a link pointing to Turn Left

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reverted your recent edit at Bakugan Battle Brawlers. In your edit you described the subject as a Japanese-American production, but that doesn't appear to be supported by the article's prose, since the production companies listed appear to be based in Japan. You also didn't add any references to support the addition and your edit summary "Article Update" didn't explain your rationale for the change. For these reasons, I have reverted your edit. Please include references if you choose to re-submit this content. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:31, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yuri Lowenthal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wildstar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yuri Lowenthal. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. I've removed bolding from this article because it contravenes MOS:BOLD, it is unsourced, it constitutes original reseach, and it adds unnecessary weight to facts that may not deserve such weight. Consensus against bolding lead roles has been established numerous times, including at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 134. It is also specifically discouraged at WP:FILMCAST, which is part of the Manual of Style for Film. You continue to restore the formatting without any rationale, acknowledgment of existing consensus, and without discussion. This is disruptive. You are invited to share your opinions on the article's talk page, but not to restore content that conflicts with consensus unless a different local consensus is achieved. Consensus is achieved through discussion, not reverts or votes. If you revert again, it will be considered edit-warring. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:06, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide reference sources for any roles for any information are adding to voice actor articles. -AngusWOOF (talk) 19:29, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Brianne Siddall[edit]

Hello Norozco1! You left a message on my talk page asking why I wanted to delete the page Brianne Siddall. I believe you may have the wrong person, as I was not part of the deletion discussion. If I'm wrong (and I might be, since I have a terrible memory), could you link to a page showing where I nominated that page for deletion or participated in a deletion discussion about it? Cheers, Gilded Snail (talk) 04:28, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your last message on talk page. Gilded Snail (talk) 21:12, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:22, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fairy Fencer F, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Lee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop harassing[edit]

I have quite enough of you thanking my edits on Yuri's page. One 'thanks' is enough. -Sk8erPrince (talk) 18:04, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i'm sorry aobut that, i'll stop alright, i didn't mean to harass you or anything, i just wanted to thank you for being so helpful to yuri's page that's all, and besides i'm still new at this so i'm trying to figure out how this system works ok. :'-( Norozco1 (talk) 18:50, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be morose, Norozco1. It is okay to thank anyone if you wish. There is no need to feel sorry. Sk8erPrince is also new here and that is the reason he was a bit rude to everyone. Regards, Jim Carter (from public cyber) 09:31, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thought we should be happy or satisfied after being thanked by someone else. There is barely anyone on Wikipedia will do that. As for me, I would consider that thank as a support for me to continue to edit. Actually I am planning to give you another barnstar because of that. Thanking each others is important, especially for people that are new, like us. I appreciate all the thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdrianGamer (talk • contribs) 15:15, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your edits in 2014 in video gaming. The content you add has make the page more detailed. You deserve some recognition. AdrianGamer (talk) 15:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry on Yuri Lowenthal page[edit]

Hey I'm sorry I removed the notable credits from the Yuri Lowenthal infobox page. I just had my brain mixed up after I had a very rough week dealing with several issues from TheFarix and Cyphoidbomb being critical here, it feels like I want to commit suicide.--107.77.64.96 (talk) 17:49, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

it's ok, just remember if you have any problems that you have, don't commit suicide or take all your anger out by removing the notable credits, just talk to someone about it and you'll feel better, ok. :-) Norozco1 (talk) 21:26, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thank you for showing support to my edits. Trust me, thanking others is never a harassment :) AdrianGamer (talk) 15:17, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 in video gaming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Keep. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Need sources for video game credits[edit]

Can you supply sources for the video game credits that you are adding to the filmographies? It is difficult to track which of these are officially credited by the game itself and which are just fan speculation. -AngusWOOF (talk) 14:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding DLC in years in video gaming[edit]

Hi there!

Thanks for letting me know about that discussion; I wasn't aware of it. I've reopened it and put my thoughts in regarding the matter. Please have a look and let me know what you think. Regards. --CoolingGibbon (talk) 03:43, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I like it, thanks for sharing your thoughts. :) Norozco1 (talk) 11:28, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not constructive[edit]

Hi, I consider this edit of yours unconstructive. There was enough information in my clearly-written edit summary for you to understand what I was saying. "Birthdate in infobox and birthdate in lead don't match. Also unsourced. BLPs must be impeccably sourced for data like this. Removing birthplace as well for same reason: unsourced since 2013." Your reversion, with the explanation "but this data is really important for everyone who sees this article" doesn't address in the slightest the concern I raised, and doesn't indicate that you read the guidelines for Biographies of Living People. If you are going to edit biographies, you need to understand the expectations the Biography community has. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:35, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i understand what your sayin now, so thanks for the information, along with the link that you've provided for me, i'd really appropriate. :-) Norozco1 (talk) 20:47, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic Boom (TV series)[edit]

Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your edits to Sonic Boom (TV series), because it wasn't supported by a reliable source. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a venue for unverifiable speculation. As an encyclopedia we should only report information that can be verified to be accurate by a third-party reliable source. In your edit you claimed that Sonic Boom will air on other television networks, such as Nickelodeon Arabia. As of September, I believe that Sega has only confirmed that Sonic Boom will be televised on Cartoon Network in the US, and Gulli and Canal J in France, followed by an global release later on. To my knowledge, Sega has not confirmed any other networks. Furthermore, the Nickelodeon Arabia appears to be defunct (no longer live). This strikes me as a red flag that you may be speculating. I appreciate your eagerness to add new content to the article, but please only add content that can be verified to be true and accurate. For help citing sources, I would give Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Wikipedia:Citing sources a read. Thanks. Mz7 (talk) 18:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to what @Mz7: said, the Network parameter and the Country parameter of the infobox are not to be used the way you are using them in this edit. The Network parameter is for the original broadcast network(s), not for syndicated networks, rerun networks, or networks across the world that also broadcast the series. If this project is a French and American co-production, then only the first French and American networks should be included. The Country parameter is for the nations that produced the series, i.e. financed it. The animation houses are typically not included in this field because they typically are hired by the production houses. See Template:Infobox television for more details. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:16, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brianne Siddall (October 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brianne Siddall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:30, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Sidall question[edit]

Hello, Norozco1. You have new messages at MatthewVanitas's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please do not tamper with my personal to-do list[edit]

I saw you added your draft to my to-do list at User:MatthewVanitas; please do not mess with others' userpages, it's quite inappropriate. I'm not interested in rescuing the Sidall article because I don't even know what it's about yet since you haven't even added that. Also, there's no need for "rescue" because you, the original author, are still here and working on it. That section of mine is for "interesting article, but originator appears to have wandered off."

In any case, just leave others' userpages alone, and focus on reading the basic Wikipedia guidelines for article writing to see if the Siddall article can pass muster. MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:46, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yuri Lowenthal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hullabaloo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced content[edit]

Hi Norozco1, please don't add unsourced content to articles as you've done here. There is no indication from sourced prose in the article that Sonic Boom is a Japanese co-production. If you have sources for the information, feel free to re-add it, but you must also provide an inline citation. See Referencing for Beginners if you are unsure how to do that. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:57, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, its just that on the previous update, i thought that he might got some sources for this article, but i guess i was wrong again. :-( But on the other hand, it said that its' a follow-up to the anime, Sonic X, so if that's true, then it brings me to that unanswered question about this, so i hope you might be able to answer this: How is Sonic X any different then the follow-up, Sonic Boom? :-/ Norozco1 (talk) 22:10, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You can't make changes based on assumptions. As for your question, I don't know how Sonic X is different from Sonic Boom. Those differences will likely be determined by sourced prose. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:55, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well. if you say so, then i'm ok with this, and i hope that these prose might have the answer that i was looking for, so i'll just wait and see how it progresses, Ok. :-) Norozco1 (talk) 23:47, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Comic con 2014 - Aug 2014.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Comic con 2014 - Aug 2014.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, i'll let you know when i have anything, okay! :-) Norozco1 (talk) 04:27, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pokémon the Movie: Diancie and the Cocoon of Destruction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marc Thompson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brianne Siddall (December 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

This article was recently deleted, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brianne Siddall. It is unlikely that it will be accepted unless new sources have been published since June covering this person.

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brianne Siddall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 08:57, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	Here is another barnstar awarded to you for your continuous and helpful contributions in the page 2014 in video gaming since June this year. Another great year has passed, and I look forward seeing your contributions in another very awesome year. By the way happy New Year. :) AdrianGamer (talk) 12:13, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yuri Lowenthal in Skylanders[edit]

Could you help look up information or ask Yuri about his Skylanders roles per talk:Yuri Lowenthal#Need other sources for Skylanders roles? -AngusWOOF (talk) 05:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why sure, i'll be glad to help ya out! :-) Norozco1 (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michele Knotz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Once Upon A Time. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Dcbanners. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sonic Boom (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dcbanners (talk) 22:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Sonic Boom (TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dcbanners (talk) 22:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to underscore this warning by Dcbanners, because I found the same edit that he did to be problematic. Norozco1, you've been around long enough to know that per WP:CRYSTAL, future events must be sourced. If you submit unsourced content again as you did, I will be strongly tempted to ask an admin to review your edits. If the data you are adding is important to you, then your first instinct should be to find a reliable published source to support it. Wikipedia's reliability as an encyclopedia is only as strong as the references that support it, and Wikipedia has no deadline. There is no rush for information to be added. Providing sources is more important than being the first person to report a fact. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:07, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Brianne Siddall[edit]

Hi Norozco, do you plan to add references to Draft:Brianne Siddall? Because if/when it goes live, it's going to have the same problem that all of these fanboy articles have, which is a glaring lack of sources. This is something you've been apprised of and it makes more sense to add the sources before it goes live than to have an improperly cited article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:08, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, i do plan to add references to Draft:Brianne Siddall, that way it would be a lot easier for editors, ya know! :-) Norozco1 (talk) 20:34, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You've already clicked the resubmit button. The smarter approach would have been to get your references sorted while you were adding the content so that there was sufficient referencing once you clicked resubmit, not to wait until another editor pointed out the problem. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:46, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i understand, I'll go try and do just that, ok! :-) Norozco1 (talk) 20:52, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Atelier Escha and Logy[edit]

There is nothing in the video you cited that officially confirms Ariel Winter as voicing Escha.
Please read this, this, and this. Linking a video of Escha's voice proves nothing. The reader is then forced to draw their own conclusion. Saying that "it sounds like her" is not acceptable. There are far too many instances I've seen of people using their ears to identify voices (instead of official sources) and being very wrong, with official sources (such as statements from the voice actors themselves) debunking them. What's to say Escha isn't one of those cases? The fact that you personally believe it sounds like Ariel Winter is ultimately not usable in the long run. You should be using objective facts. Citing subjective opinions as "official sources" just shouldn't be done.
Not to mention that Ariel Winter is highly unlikely to have worked on this game, based on its status as a union dub, Winter's status as a union actress with a high-profile regular TV role among many other obligations, and the limited talent pool used in game dubs.--Shadoman (talk) 17:43, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ok, your right, im sorry for lack of information, and i hope that in the near future, i'll try to find important sources, ok. :-) Norozco1 (talk) 21:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brianne Siddall (March 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CookieMonster755 was:

This article has already been in the main space, and deleted 2 times, due to reliability concerns. Here is an archived discussion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brianne Siddall.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brianne Siddall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CookieMonster755 (talk) 18:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sloppy editing[edit]

Your edits at Draft:Brianne Siddall in these edits are very sloppy. AngusWOOF clearly did not place these templates, and the second one is seemingly forced within an embedded comment. This sort of sloppy editing raises concerns about your competence, which is underscored by your previous problematic edits, your reluctance and/or confusion about providing sources, your questionable and confusing talk page responses, etc. This doesn't paint the best portrait of you, so please elevate your edits as quickly as possible. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:02, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please write up the biography first, and not focus on her filmography so that it can survive notability. And it does not need an under construction tag, especially with my name on it. Thanks. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:54, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In retrospect, Norozco, I believe my note above was needlessly stern, so I apologize for that. In spirit, however, yes, you should please try to pay more attention to detail and hit "Show preview" before committing your changes to an article. Everyone makes mistakes, but this method will help you avoid many. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:37, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i'll try using that method, thanks for that! :-) Norozco1 (talk) 21:56, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Legend of Kay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Brianne Siddall concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Brianne Siddall, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Norozco1. You have new messages at Hasteur's talk page.
Message added 12:22, 16 October 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hasteur (talk) 12:22, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yuri Lowenthal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brianne Siddall credits[edit]

Can you please check over the closing credits additions you made? The IP editor is trying to add closing credits but they are incorrect. For example, Doug's 1st movie doesn't show Brianne in the English voice cast but much later in the "additional voice cast" section. If you can cite where you saw the episode credit e.g. via YouTube, Netflix, Neon Alley, Hulu, On Demand, or broadcast TV, or DVD please do so. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 07:26, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing! ;) NJOrozco 14:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Regarding Netflix entries, use via=Netflix instead of network=Netflix if you saw it on Watch Instantly. If you rented the DVD then use medium=DVD and put the year of the DVD production. You then don't need to say it was seen on Netflix. I removed Disappearance of Haruhi Suzumiya as that wasn't a title on Netflix Watch Instantly. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok AngusWOOF, I understand, i'll try to remember that, thanks for the tip! ;) Norozco1 (talk) 11:49, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Signature[edit]

Hi NJOrozco, I noticed your signature doesn't have any links to your user page or talk page. Per the guidlines at Wikipedia:Signatures "Signatures must include at least one direct internal link to your user page, user talk page, or contributions page" so can you please fix this. Thank you. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, if that's all, this I'll fix it right away! :) Norozco1 (talk) 11:49, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Norozco1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ebyabe[edit]

Please tell him those sources are proof of her role as Amy Rose in Sonic the Hedgehog, I get tired of arguing against users that refuse to understand and listen. 2600:1000:B030:84E3:F0B3:771B:101D:EFE9 (talk) 22:59, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 23:16, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No surprise there. 174.192.38.189 (talk) 23:36, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Hard to understand why those IPs keep using unreliable sources. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Repel All Boarders ‖ 00:23, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks reliable too me. 2600:1000:B07C:65D1:91CA:39EF:FA66:8C7 (talk) 01:42, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Janice Kawaye[edit]

Took the liberty to restore your edit on Janice Kawaye. It looks like The Love Pony has return as another IP user. I hate sock puppets. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 06:42, 1 September 2017 (UTC) Yeah, me too, :/ Norozco1 (talk) 08:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Norozco1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Norozco1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]