User talk:NorthHuanter

Welcome![edit]

Hello, NorthHuanter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mjroots (talk) 23:21, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ryan kirkpatrick, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. YSSYguy (talk) 01:18, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NorthHuanter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello I have been blocked as a sock of Ryan Kirkpatrick? I have made it clear in the stock investigation the reason for my contributions and understand and made clear of my mistakes and action. The Bushranger said that, This editor displays behavior that is inconsistent with somebody new and learning Wikipedia's policies. If you look at my contributions at the start I made disasters in 2014 and there was a gap of a few day's and that was because I was looking into Wikipedia's policies before I edited Downend air crash. I only made edits to 2014 Norfolk helicopter crash and made creates Category pages (which has seen been deleted) in order to help not to damage. I still understand my mistakes which led to the investigation and I been trying to lay low until I am confident to make real contributions by still looking into Wikipedia's policies. Like I said before I am sorry for the mistakes I have done and wish to make better contributions in time, thank you.

Decline reason:

WP:DUCK. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:59, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.