User talk:Northerner44

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Northerner44! Thank you for your contributions. I am C.Fred and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! —C.Fred (talk) 19:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ban (unit) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ban (unit) was changed by Northerner44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.942144 on 2014-12-01T01:48:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:48, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:C.Fred‎. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:00, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ... discospinster _talk 16:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Northerner44 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel that I was unfairly blocked by discospinster and would like orange Mike to appeal, I have made past constructive edits, however one strike an out does not make; please reconsider

Decline reason:

Clear disruption going on here; plenty of reason to block on sight for this. only (talk) 22:40, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblocking yourself doesn't work, as you've no doubt noticed. If you modify a declined unblock again, your talk page access will be revoked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:37, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very condescending...