Jump to content

User talk:Notrealname1234/Archive/1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


July 2023

Although not a policy violation, archiving posts so quickly is not good practice, particularly when they are warnings. It looks like you're trying to hide your errors. If you hadn't archived the post from Ingenuity, I would have noticed it and not warned you a second time for the same behavior.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:29, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Oh ok. Sorry about it, Notrealname1234 (talk) 17:30, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
But can you add Ingenuity's post here? @Bbb23 Notrealname1234 (talk) 17:32, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
also, i added it only one time, not two times. Notrealname1234 (talk) 17:34, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
I never said you added it (I assume you mean the ruling) twice, I was referring to my warning being a second one after Ingenuity's. You archived Ingenuity's post; you can undo it if you wish. At this point, the best thing you can do is not archive things quickly in the future. You have auto-archiving set up. I didn't look at how often it auto-archives, but assuming it's a reasonable amount of time, just let the bot do its job.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:46, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Ok, i will. Notrealname1234 (talk) 17:49, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi Notrealname1234, when patrolling biographical edits, please keep in mind that restoring material others have objected to in good faith may be prohibited without obtaining a consensus first, and that repeating gossip or self-published sources' statements is problematic. In the moment you restore material on Wikipedia, you are legally responsible for it.

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:05, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

2024 Ohio Republican presidential primary edit

By itself, google drive probably isn't a reliable source, but the google drive page I used as a source was a pdf of a poll conducted by Ohio Northern University. C. W. Edward (talk) 00:38, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Is there an official site (not on google drive) that has this pdf? Notrealname1234 (talk) 00:40, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
After I did a search for "ohio northern university poll", the sources that talked about this poll, including the University's website all used this link. C. W. Edward (talk) 03:33, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Ok, i will readd this link then. Notrealname1234 (talk) 13:55, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Nevermind, you already reverted my edit. Notrealname1234 (talk) 13:57, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 31, 2023)

Michelangelo's David is the classical image of youthful male beauty in Western art.
Hello, Notrealname1234. The article for improvement of the week is:

Man

Please be bold and help improve it!


Previous selections: Act (drama) • Religious philosophy


Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Email

Thanks for your email, which you sent a few days ago, but which I have only just discovered. That's because you sent it directly to the address I use only for Wikipedia emails, rather than via Wikipedia's email service, so I didn't get a notification, and I usually don't check that email address unless I do get a notification. At one time I used to put a note at the bottom of each Wikipedia email warning about that; I suppose I should go back to doing so. Anyway, I have now dealt with the matter you mentioned. As always, thanks for letting me know. JBW (talk) 12:41, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

No problem! Notrealname1234 (talk) 14:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi Notrealname1234. Thank you for your contributions, but please take a moment to familiarize yourself with WP:DRAFTIFY. The policy says that articles should only be moved to draft if there is no evidence of active improvement; the rule of thumb is that you should wait at least an hour after the last edit. You moved National team appearances in the FIBA U18 Men Basketball European Championship just ten minutes after it was created. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 18:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-31

MediaWiki message delivery 23:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

This week's article for improvement (week 32, 2023)

A goalkeeper in action
Hello, Notrealname1234. The article for improvement of the week is:

Goalkeeper

Please be bold and help improve it!


Previous selections: Man • Act (drama)


Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 7 August 2023 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Tech News: 2023-32

MediaWiki message delivery 21:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).

Administrator changes

added Firefangledfeathers
removed

Interface administrator changes

added Novem Linguae

Technical news

Arbitration


This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2023)

Hello, Notrealname1234. The article for improvement of the week is:

Miss

Please be bold and help improve it!


Previous selections: Goalkeeper • Man


Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 14 August 2023 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Tech News: 2023-33

MediaWiki message delivery 05:58, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 August 2023

This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2023)

Hello, Notrealname1234. The article for improvement of the week is:

Physiology

Please be bold and help improve it!


Previous selections: Miss • Goalkeeper


Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Tech News: 2023-34

— Preceding unsigned comment added by MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs) 15:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC) 15:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Re-instating talk page warnings

Hello, I see that you are re-adding a warning on User talk:Xevres. Just a heads up that users can remove warnings on their own talk pages, see WP:BLANKING. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 11:52, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. Notrealname1234 (talk) 11:55, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Warnings

Hi, thanks for your revert to City of Industry (film). However, when you get to a reverted editor's talk page and they've already received a recent final warning, please don't give them another final warning: report them to WP:ARV. Thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 15:51, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

I removed the warning, thanks for noticing that. Notrealname1234 (talk) 15:55, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Also, the IP is already reported at AIV by a bot, so there is no need to report it again. Notrealname1234 (talk) 15:56, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!