User talk:NuclearSecrets
Welcome!
[edit]Hi NuclearSecrets! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! RFD (talk) 13:01, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
DYK for John Coster-Mullen
[edit]
On 11 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Coster-Mullen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Coster-Mullen discovered that the Little Boy was actually a girl? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Coster-Mullen. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John Coster-Mullen), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 7,941 views (661.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2021 – nice work! |
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Starling (nuclear primary) moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Starling (nuclear primary), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
While I don't agree with the move, adding page numbers would likely be easier than arguing about it.Kylesenior (talk) 02:24, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- I may do neither! :-) (I am pretty busy at the moment, and worrying about meeting the inconsistent standards applied to Wikipedia articles is not high on my level of priorities right now.) --NuclearSecrets (talk) 02:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, fair enough. Kylesenior (talk) 01:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:John Coster-Mullen
[edit]
Hello, NuclearSecrets. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Coster-Mullen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:John Coster-Mullen
[edit]
Hello, NuclearSecrets. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John Coster-Mullen".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:26, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Your improved Shrimp device image is now a featured image.
[edit]
Sorry I didn't loop you in, but "inviting" people for votes is normally frowned on. Cheers Kylesenior (talk) 12:32, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Starling (nuclear primary)
[edit] Hello, NuclearSecrets. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Starling (nuclear primary), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
I didn't realize you had edited the some nuclide symbols.
[edit]Hi NuclearSecrets. I just had a bunch of edits that I made to nuclide symbols in the Nuclear weapon design article reverted by VQuakr. I then found out that I'd accidentally been undoing his reversions, and eventually that I had probably undone some of yours. I didn't think to check the revision history page of the article before starting to go through the first quarter or so of the article with control F, typing in IUPAC names to replace the nuclide symbol templates that were used in prose. I am very new to Wikipedia. It seems I misread your posts and those of VQuakr as a green light, or at least an amber one. Polar Apposite (talk) 20:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The missing volume
[edit]The published set of 36 books of the Manhattan District History seems to be missing a volume. They released the secret appendix to Volume VI, but not the volume itself. It does exist though; it was reproduced in The Secret History. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Right, the Liquid Thermal Diffusion volume. I have a copy of it from the 1977 microfilm Manhattan Project Official History and Documents. At some point I will update my blog posting; I have also made updated versions of several of the other volumes that restores some of the excised materials from other sources. --NuclearSecrets (talk) 11:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- That would be awesome. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)