User talk:Nyjja

This is Nyjja's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: SUBTLE – The Subtitlers' Association (August 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also see WP:COI.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SUBTLE – The Subtitlers' Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 09:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nyjja! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 09:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Greenman! Thank you very much for reviewing my article. I understand that I need to make it read more like an encyclopedia entry than an advertisement, and I'd be happy to make the appropriate edits. It would be most helpful, though, if you could specify the parts that raised your concern. Is it more about the phrasing of specific paragraphs or the external sources I used? If so, which? I would appreciate it if you could send me any details. Thank you! Nyjja (talk) 16:14, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Greenman! I corrected the article based on your comments and the advice I received in the Teahouse and resubmitted it for review. I was wondering if you could please take another look at it. Nyjja (talk) 20:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Subtle-logo-NO-tagline.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Subtle-logo-NO-tagline.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Nyjja! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Declined article / request for more feedback, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SUBTLE – The Subtitlers' Association (October 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RPSkokie was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SUBTLE – The Subtitlers' Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 12:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SUBTLE – The Subtitlers' Association (February 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lead is still poorly written, after 2 declines already. Draft title may not be good for acceptance.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SUBTLE – The Subtitlers' Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 13:59, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Subtitlers' Association has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Subtitlers' Association. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 08:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Subtitlers' Association (May 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by MaxnaCarta were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Organisation not notable. Article appears to be advertising and the lack of notability cannot be overcome with further editing.

— MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 14:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Subtitlers' Association[edit]

Hello, Nyjja. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Subtitlers' Association, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]