User talk:Nytaxpayer
A quick note of thanks for bringing some information and insight to this article. As you may have noticed, I put up enough information to frame some walls against WP:COI. One reason I paused ... was to let the Freedom Tower rise -- letting that fact save a lot of words.
Perhaps the correct version can evolve now. But remember the Wikipedia process requires "reliable sources" WP:RELIABLE. Well, enough for now. Again, my sincere thanks for bringing a lamp to the scene. Proofreader77 (talk) 06:40, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
(big picture)
[edit](NOTE: I read your note on my page, you're welcome.) In weighing action regarding that page—which, I agree, may perhaps be very close to a candidate for deletion—the lingering raw emotions in the aftermath of that terrible day do hold some (diminishing) sway. While I am troubled by anyone wielding that argument to push (clearly, futilely, now) for rebuilding the the towers as they were, I am swayed enough ... not to be in a rush. As I said above, the Freedom Tower rising is the unassailable proof of "what is" and "what is not to be."
Too many words. :) BOTTOM LINE: The guidelines of Wikipedia provide a net for "the players" ... and I'm hoping the COI side will abandon the field -- so we don't have to get into a procedural conflict (which can clearly be won -- but life is short, yes?:) As you see, I built the fort for such a battle -- but happy to let the snowballs melt. lol Cheers. Proofreader77 (talk) 10:10, 25 February 2009 (UTC)