User talk:Oasis5Bridge

December 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Swadge2. I noticed that you recently removed content from Claudia Mason without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Swadge2 (talk) 02:41, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We are Claudia Mason’s representatives. Who are you to assume authority on publishing incorrect and unauthorized information about Ms. Mason? We are correcting your mistakes. Oasis5Bridge (talk) 02:51, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone is authorized to edit wikipedia, please see Wikipedia:Ownership of content. Jamedeus (talk) 03:22, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Claudia Mason, you may be blocked from editing. Swadge2 (talk) 02:50, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you? Please stop. Oasis5Bridge (talk) 02:51, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Claudia Mason. Philipnelson99 (talk) 02:58, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Claudia Mason shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jamedeus (talk) 03:17, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It has been found that you have been using one or more accounts abusively or have edited logged out to avoid scrutiny. Please review the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use two accounts on the same article, or the same topic area, unless they are publicly and plainly disclosed on both your and the other account's userpage.

Your other account(s) have been blocked indefinitely. This is your only warning. If you repeat this behavior you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:48, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]