User talk:Ocean Shores/Sandbox

Return to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/September 2010

Please leave comments/discussions about the new GOCE barnstar design below.

What requirements must be met before one can receive this barnstar? The Raptor ^{You rang?}/_{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions} 18:00, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This was not meant to be a specific award; rather, I meant for it to be, in a way, a template (notice the {{{1}}} and {{{2}}} fields). Perhaps we could use it thus:

The Guild of Copy-Editors Tireless Contributor Award

for copy editing 20,000 words. Ocean Shores (Formerly TEK) 18:08, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This would definitely give a more unified look to the barnstars. What do you think? Ocean Shores (Formerly TEK) 18:08, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. Isn't receiving the actual barnstar better than receiving a GOCE-fied version of it? The Raptor ^{You rang?}/_{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions} 18:11, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But how is the design and layout, as a whole? Ocean Shores (Formerly TEK) 18:28, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I like the design and layout. The Raptor ^{You rang?}/_{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions} 19:34, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shall we use it then? Ocean Shores (Formerly TEK) 21:25, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About what you pointed out above,the "GOCE" part was not meant to segregate barnstars. I'll post it on the drive talk page. But do we keep the picture? Ocean Shores (Formerly TEK) 22:37, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we should use it, for the same reasons stated on the drive's talk page. It's nice and all, but in my opinion, it will not be as good as receiving the actual barnstar. The Raptor ^{You rang?}/_{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions} 12:58, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]