User talk:Ogbonna Ruby Ebere

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sesan Kareem (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sesan Kareem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333-blue 04:27, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Ogbonna Ruby Ebere, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 333-blue 04:27, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Sesan Kareem for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sesan Kareem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sesan Kareem until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 18:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Collins Osuagwu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Collins Osuagwu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRehse (talk) 19:08, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Jude Feranmi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jude Feranmi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jude Feranmi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:47, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

/* Undisclosed paid editing */

Hello Ogbonna Ruby Ebere. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ogbonna Ruby Ebere. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ogbonna Ruby Ebere|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. SmartSE (talk) 12:57, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

• Reply :I understand the rules and can assure you, i am not in any way going against it.

I love written and feel the only way i can learn and contributes is on wikipedia that is the reason why i concentrate more creating New relevant Article after conducting series of research as required before an Article can be created and i am not in any way compensated or paid for my voluntory service in other not to break the rules of neutrality

Ogbonna Ruby Ebere (talk) 20:44, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Mistakenly Blocked Account of suckpuppet

This is what i saw on google https://deletionpedia.org/en/Abayomi_Rotimi_Mighty and i help to improve it and posted it to Article space, i have no connections of what so ever with the Sockpuppet Account of NORTHCLICK.

Ogbonna Ruby Ebere (talk) 11:28, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Mistakenly blocked user

http://deletedwiki.com/index.php?title=Abayomi_Rotimi_Mighty and some other online related sources i used.

Was shocked to be link to what i know nothing about... Please use your good office to look closely into this issues.

I will appreciate if it resolved as soon as possible.

Thanks.

Ogbonna Ruby Ebere (talk) 11:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC)