User talk:Okpeletier2

Okpeletier2, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Okpeletier2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wentworth s7 banner.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wentworth s7 banner.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:09, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wentworth s7 teaser poster.jpeg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wentworth s7 teaser poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 08:17, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ST47 (talk) 00:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Okpeletier2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am extremely confused as to why I have been blocked. I have been editing with no problems for some months and have suddenly been blocked for being a 'sock puppet'. Please acknowledge that I have made 0 problematic edits, have made over 100 edits that have caused no problems, and have always stuck to the Wikipedia guidelines.

Decline reason:

You are pretty clearly the blocked user, Okpeletier. Therefore, every single edit you've made has been problematic. Every single one has been in violation of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. You are not welcome here until your original account is unblocked. Given your abuse here, that's unlikely in the near future. Yamla (talk) 15:12, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Okpeletier2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am extremely sorry for this. I don't mean to sound like I am trying to fight my back back into this account but I would like to explain these violations. The reason I was blocked from my original account was accidental mis-use of Wikipedia as a web host. I did not initially understand that Wikipedia was not a web host but I now know that is it not. Unfortunately, I did not familiarise myself with the clear violation of creating another account, which I stupidly believed was harmless due to me now understanding the grounds of my block, which was marked as indefinite, and not violating that again. I have made many edits on this account, some of which took hours, and have stuck to the guidelines, unfortunately not realising I was not supposed to be on another account. Please forgive my errors, and understand I am not here maliciously and am begging for an unblock, even if that means I am monitored by someone to ensure I stick to the rules (which I will) if you deem necessary. Thank you again.

Decline reason:

You need to request unblock on your original account. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:10, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.