User talk:Oksquirrel
September 2022[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Heads of former ruling families, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 21:04, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Heads of former ruling families. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 06:26, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
October 2022[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Heads of former ruling families, you may be blocked from editing. Celia Homeford (talk) 15:41, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
November 2022[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Heads of former ruling families. The citations must explicitly say that the individual is the head of the family, or claims to be the head of the family. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:51, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
January 2023[edit]
Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Annexation of Hyderabad, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:23, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.