User talk:Ola.saurabh

Hi there. I welcome you for any information, discussion or feedback. I may also be contacted via e-mail at ola.saurabh@gmail.com.

Please write your messages here after[edit]

Hello, Ola.saurabh. You have new messages at Useddenim's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ola.saurabh/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ola.saurabh, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asian Trade Promotion Forum has been accepted[edit]

Asian Trade Promotion Forum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:01, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About Asian Trade Promotion Forum[edit]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Asian Trade Promotion Forum a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. MONARCH ♔ 20:41, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of India Trade Promotion Organisation[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article India Trade Promotion Organisation you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tarunpant -- Tarunpant (talk) 08:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ola.saurabh. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations.
Message added 07:28, 23 June 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:28, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to India Trade Promotion Organisation, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to India Trade Promotion Organisation, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is absolutely not acceptable. You should not remove maintenance tags without addressing the issues they are placed for. Beware of such behavior. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of India Trade Promotion Organisation[edit]

The article India Trade Promotion Organisation you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:India Trade Promotion Organisation for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dharmadhyaksha -- Dharmadhyaksha (talk) 05:41, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Azad Kashmir seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I fully agree with you that Wikipedia is used by versatile people and that is precisely the edit I had done. Nowhere in the article POK is mentioned, which is opinion of 1.3 billion people of India and many more. If opinion of 1.3 billion plus people doesn't find a mention on Wikipedia, then I really doubt its purpose and bias. In my opinion, I stand by my edit and suggest you to consider that as opinion of Indians and many more liberal people. -- User:Ola.saurabh 11:38, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is mentioned in footnote 1. That is the only kind of mention that Wikipedia policies allow. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 06:57, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! In that case please also correct "Aksai Chin is the disputed border area between China and India. It is administered by China as part of Hotan County, which lies in the southwestern part of Hotan Prefecture of Xinjiang Autonomous Region, but is also claimed by India as a part of the Ladakh region of the state of Jammu and Kashmir." Put this whole thing in footnote 1 and write that Aksai Chin is part of China since time immemorial. And by that definition, please don't correct the misleading information on Tibet such as, "In 1962 China and India fought a brief war over the disputed South Tibet and Aksai Chin regions. Although China won the war, Chinese troops withdrew north of the McMahon Line, effectively ceding South Tibet to India." #letWikipediaBeMoreBiased --saurabh loves wiki (talk) 07:42, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adopt-a-user[edit]

Hello. This is a courtesy note to inform you that I have removed the "adopt me" template from your User page. You have not been active on Wikipedia for some time (Sep 2017). Its presence misleads others into thinking that you are still seeking to be adopted and to be guided by another editor under the Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user scheme. Obviously, you are completely free to reinsert it if you return to active editing and want to seek adoption again. (Just 'undo' my edit in the history of your user page to put it back). For simple questions about editing, just ask any of us at The Teahouse. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 12:06, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delhi Meetup ![edit]

Hello ! Greetings of the day ! A meetup plus onsite editing event is being planned in New Delhi, this Sunday. I request you to please attend the same. More details here -Abhinav619 (talk) 04:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]