User talk:Olirampling

Image copyright problem with Image:Defenders of the hatew.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Defenders of the hatew.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ricky Gervais. Your edits appear to constitute YOUR A FUCKING FAGGOT WITH NO FUKCING LIFE SO DONT TRY TELLING ME WHAT TO DO YOU FUCKING CUNTvandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 14:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User:Rodhullandemu, you will be blocked from editing. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 14:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

too be honest with you im fucking sick of editing all i do is go around after other cunts that think they know what they are talking about when most of the fucking articles dont make any sense what so ever people fucking quoting student newspapers i mean fuck off.

Your useful edits, we won't have a problem with. However, edits like this one aren't useful. They violate one of the most basic policies and are a sure way to get blocked. Another way to get blocked is to be uncivil to or attack your fellow editors. Another way to get blocked is to vandalise another editor's user page. Trying to be friendly here, but it might be a good idea to get to know some of our rules, and your edits will be watched for a while to make sure you've got the hang of them. Now chill, please. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 15:43, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message; however, I'd lay off the "fags" talk, it won't win you any friends here. We are (or try to be) a tolerant community. Sure, there are gay people here, just as there are at your school or in your town and it shouldn't make a difference. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 12:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I've added a fair Use Rationale for the "Six Feet Under" logo & added it to the band's article. Worth having a look at the image page to see how these things are done. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 12:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Six feet under promo 2005.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Six feet under promo 2005.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Soxπed Ninety Three | tc db 15:06, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Band-promo-2003.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Band-promo-2003.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Soxπed Ninety Three | tc db 15:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Six Feet Under Logo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Six Feet Under Logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:10, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SFU logo[edit]

I may well do, but it will be on the condition that you stop your disruptive edits immediately. Ase nine ^(talk)^(contribs) 21:56, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Six Feet Under logo could do with a transparent background.

Vandalism[edit]

You have already received your last warning, now I am requesting an administrator's attention for you to be blocked. Ase nine ^(talk)^(contribs) 17:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for harassing other editors and homophobic remarks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

The Rambling Man (talk) 17:19, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olirampling (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i shouldn't be blocked... i asked him a simple question and he thought he had the right to be rude... i was rude back and now my account is blocked... im not an unconstrutive person.. you dont understand how gay this person was acting. and fyi... gay and fag dont have to be homophobic.. my brothers a fag and i dont go chasing him with a fucking torch. "I may well do, but it will be on the condition that you stop your disruptive edits immediately" he was trying to be a big headed administrator i asked him a question all he had to say was yes or no not get rude for no reason.. you know what this schmuck should be blocked. i showed what i send to some (Talk) and he did it for me on the six feet under page... were talking about a guy that asked me not be an ass. and i wasnt i sent his to this asseine page and asked him and he did rather than be a cock like asseine. look im on wikipedia to help out about bands nothing else no unconstrutive edits... tell that prick to leave me alone and i wont ask him anything. he is such a loser that its stupid.

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblocking provided. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 18:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olirampling (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

could i be unblocked from editing now please, i would like to continue on editing wikipedia pages in a constructive way, focusing on bands in particular. i apologie for my disrutive behaviour it will not continue.

Decline reason:

reason I'm not convinced.— — Rlevse • Talk • 01:11, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Six Feet Under Logo.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Six Feet Under Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]