User talk:Olivaceum

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LicentiaA. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:42, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a sockpuppet account and have no connection to the other accounts mentioned. I have not even made any edits yet which is not what a sockpuppet account would do. These accusations are conspiratorial as I looked up the account mentioned and found that it no longer exists. Olivaceum (talk) 15:06, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olivaceum (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Falsely accused of being a sockpuppet account when I have not yet made any edits

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. There's no meaningful doubt here, none at all. Yamla (talk) 15:17, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please unblock me because I am not a sockpuppet account and can confirm that there is no connection with other accounts. I want to be able to contribute to Wikipedia in a legitimate way but overzealous mods have blocked this account and levied conspiratorial reasoning for doing so. I know you won’t believe this because Wikipedia is a closed and elitist space where only the most endowed are allowed to have an account and contribute Olivaceum (talk) 15:24, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olivaceum (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unreasonably blocked for false sockpuppet accusations because mods want Wikipedia to be an elitist exclusive club where only a small number of people are allowed to contribute

Decline reason:

Whatever. Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 03:46, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TPA revoked

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.