User talk:Omnitaus

This is Omnitaus's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elope inc (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft reads promotionally. No particular examples are given of promotional language, because the article needs a complete rework for language. Also, there is serious overlinking to ordinary English words such as business and employees.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elope inc and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:15, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Omnitaus, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:15, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elope inc (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elope inc and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:18, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Are you associated with elope, Inc.? If so, please read the conflict of interest policy and make the required disclosure, and, if necessary, the paid editing disclosure. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:22, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for not answering this one sooner. As I mentioned below, I'm not affiliated with the corporation. Omnitaus (talk) 22:15, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AFC

Please do not remove AFC declines and comments from an article in AFC. Maybe you didn't notice that there are small instructions saying not to remove that material. It is removed by a script when the article is accepted. Maybe you didn't know. Now you do. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did not notice that, thank you for the explanation and patience. It won't happen again! Omnitaus (talk) 20:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you associated with Elope Inc.? If so, please make the required disclosures. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not affiliated with them in any way Omnitaus (talk) 20:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Omnitaus! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:14, Thursday, June 9, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

TWA response

Hi Omnitaus, welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for taking the The Wikipedia Adventure and leaving some nice comments - we really value your input on the project, and we will look into adding more syntax/template lessons. Happy editing! -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 20:28, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elope (business) (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ringbang was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The tone and content of the article do not strike me as encyclopedic. Similarly, the content of the sources given do not firmly establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elope (business) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ringbang (talk) 17:32, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elope (business) (June 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MorbidEntree was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elope (business) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}^(Contribs)(please reply using {{ping}},^{(unless this is on my own talk page)} otherwise I may not see your reply) 09:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elope (business) has been accepted

Elope (business), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Primefac (talk) 16:54, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Date format

You asked on IRC about the preferred date format for references. Generally I'd go with either "January 15, 1900" or "15 January 1900", depending on what's the predominant format currently used or on the geographic relevance (British articles get "day month year", American ones get "month day, year"). The ISO format of "1900-01-15" is also acceptable. What I would advise against due to possible ambiguity is shortening the year to two digits; would 12-11-10 be November 10, 2012, November 12, 2010 or something else, maybe December 11, 2010? Huon (talk) 20:19, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, I will stick to the "January 15, 1900" format! Omnitaus (talk) 20:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Waldo Waldo 5K Logo.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Waldo Waldo 5K Logo.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 04:22, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]