User talk:OneLonelyDesert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Mark Dice, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:21, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mark Dice with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jsharpminor (talk) 19:40, 11 April 2013 (UTC) Well Jsharpminor...you are just an ignorant annoying troll[reply]

Mark Dice[edit]

Well in my editing I changed the authors name cause I will show you that the real authors name is Mark Allen Shouldice and not Mark Dice

These two links shows exactly that the author Mark Dice is really Mark Shouldice aka Mark Allen Shouldice The author also in 'your' edited version tells that Mark Dice wrote these two books which clearly estates in these links that the authors name is Mark Allen Shouldice. Mark Dice is just his username and not biographical name.

http://arcc.co.san-diego.ca.us/arcc/services/fbn/search.aspx?FBNNum=2005022762 http://arcc.co.san-diego.ca.us/arcc/services/fbn/search.aspx?FBNNum=2008010467 — Preceding unsigned comment added by OneLonelyDesert (talkcontribs) 19:35, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but this is where WP:COMMONNAME comes into play. Simply put an article should be located at the most common title for the subject. For example, the rapper Snoop Dogg is located at that title and not at "Calvin Cordozar Broadus" (his real name). Though it depends on the context in which the name was used, pages often refer to the subject using the most known name.
However, the edit has another issue. It seems you used Find&replace to edit any instance of the word "Dice" which introduced multiple errors. For example, [this youtube video reference] has is title "Danny Bonaduce on Oreilly Factor talking about Mark Dice confrontation". Yet after your change the title was mentioned to be "Danny Bonaduce on the O'Reilly Factor Talking about Mark Allen Shouldice confrontation" which is incorrect. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 20:10, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Mark Dice. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This will replace my prior warning Fiddle Faddle (talk) 20:16, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Mark Dice, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do not use primary documents such as county assessor filings. Binksternet (talk) 20:58, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 20:59, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OneLonelyDesert. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 21:28, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  – Connormah (talk) 22:49, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]