User talk:Ongtianhua

Case Closed Movie # 2[edit]

Hi there I was just wondering if you would be interested in helping me improve the Case Closed: The Fourteenth Target article ,sense you seem to be familur with case closed, and have edited the 1st movie artcile a lot. I saw this movie so I am going to try and help out as much as I can, but any help from other people would be great. Just compare this artcile to the older movie The Time-Bombed Skyscraper . That one has far more info and is better then this artcile. I'd like and try to make the 2nd movie, as good as the first one. - Prede (talk) 00:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA[edit]

Hi, I use Huggle a lot in my vandalism fighting and I noticed that you created a RfA. So my question is, is this a serious RfA or were you just making a test page or something? Just curious. Cheers, --ThoseStarsBurnLikeDiamonds stargaze 09:05, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A serious RfA. =)TianHua (talk) 11:37, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a withdrawal? If so, there are other edits to make (which I can do). Frank | talk 12:36, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like one to me. If not, you should still close it per WP:SNOW and WP:NOTNOW. Cheers, --ThoseStarsBurnLikeDiamonds stargaze 01:23, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have closed the RfA. Please do not be discouraged; there's lots of good advice provided below. Thanks for your desire to contribute, and keep it up! Frank | talk 03:28, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Free RFA advice[edit]

Thank you for submitting your RFA. While I applaud enthusiasm, I'm afraid you do not yet possess sufficient knowledge/experience for the community to have confidence in your readiness to become an admin. You may find the following advice helpful. If you have not done so already, please read

Generally, It has been my experience that it takes at least 3,000 edits in a variety of areas to learn policy and guidelines well enough to attempt adminship. Also, nominees returning after an unsuccessful RfA should wait at least another 3,000 edits and 3 months before trying again. Nominees need to show the ability to contribute a number of significant edits to build the encyclopedia.

The Admin tools allow the user to block and unblock other editors, delete and undelete pages and protect and unprotect pages. Nominees will therefore do well to gain experience and familiarity with such areas as WP:AIV, WP:AFD, WP:CSD, Wikipedia:Protection policy, and WP:BLOCK to learn when to do these things.
Adminship inevitably leads one to 1) need to explain clearly the reasons for one's decisions, 2) need to review one's decisions and change one's mind when it is reasonable to do so, 3) need to review one's decisions and stand firm when it is reasonable to do so, 4) need to negotiate a compromise. Admins need a familiarity with dispute resolution. The ability to communicate clearly is essential.
Article building is the raison d'être of Wikipedia. I recommend significant participation in WP:GA or WP:FA as the surest way to gain article building experience. Alternatively, one should have added a total of 30,000 bytes of content, not necessarily all in one article. I find a large number of "Wikignome" type edits to be helpful.
My suggestion would be to try again in another 3 months and 3000 edits. I recommend taking part in RfA discussions to help learn from the experiences of others. Many nominees have found it helpful to obtain an Editor Review or to receive Admin coaching before submitting their RfA. Hope this helps. Good luck and happy editing. Dloh cierekim 14:47, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]