User talk:OnlyThenDidI

OnlyThenDidI, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi OnlyThenDidI! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Blocked[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Neel.arunabh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:23, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OnlyThenDidI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account is definitely not a sockpuppet. I am not the same person as @Neel.arunabh:. I have participated in WP:AfD discussions and I will make useful edits in the future.

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppet, the technical evidence is exceptionally clear in this case. Yamla (talk) 19:37, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OnlyThenDidI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not going to do anymore Sockpuppetry. I will make useful contributions soon.

Decline reason:

When you are ready to make useful contributions, please request unblock from your original account. 331dot (talk) 20:01, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OnlyThenDidI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am the person using this account, and I have not used any other account.

Decline reason:

So let's see how that works. User:Neel.arunabh edited the article Soviet Union at 05:23 on a particular day on a particular IP on a device with certain identifying characteristics. Then this user was created at 05:27 on the same day, on the same IP, with an identical device. The very first thing this account did was defend an edit made by the other account, at ⋾. Feel free to explain. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 01:20, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OnlyThenDidI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User:Neel.arunabh's edits are only a coincidence. Two people can share the same IP. I can't log in to User:Neel.arunabh's account. And, I edited Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Aycock. I can see the discussion there and can see that User:Neel.arunabh was never a participant there. OnlyThenDidI (talk) 02:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

All of these are basically red herrings that many socks before you have used in equally vain, foolish attempts to convince us that you can't possibly be the same person. Since this is the fourth request within two days and you're not likely at this point to do anything more than waste our time (and yours, TBH) with additional requests, I am not only declining the unblock, I will be revoking your talk page access. Have a nice day. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:04, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 05:05, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]