User talk:Onlyonlyrules

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Onlyonlyrules (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What? some retarded admin assumed me as another account.

Decline reason:

Your first edit was to pitch in to an article which has seen one of the most prolonged and pointless editwars on Wikipedia, and to make an edit which endorses a point of view. Your unblock request shows some knowledge of Wikipedia. I think the conclusion that this is a disruptive sockpuppet account is reasonable. Attacking the administrator responsible for blocking you does not give me confidence in you as a constructive user, so I am refusing your request to be unblocked. Sam Blacketer 14:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

While I can't see immediately what user you're supposedly a sockpuppet of, calling people "retarded" isn't very helpful. SQL ^{Query me!} 14:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]