User talk:OperaJoeGreen

OperaJoeGreen first post[edit]

I am setting up the talk page. My User page is User:OperaJoeGreen (signed) OperaJoeGreen (talk) 08:49, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stars and planets[edit]

Hi! First, I want to say that I'm very happy with the energetic clean-up work you've been doing. I hope ultimately it can extend to some of the related articles as well.

With regard to the deletion discussion, I have to admit that I'm not really very good at predicting how those discussions are going to turn out, but my current impression is that the pro-delete viewpoint is not prevailing. It would be unusual indeed for a deletion to take place while a clean--up is in progress -- the pro-delete side has to shift its position from "this is a mess" to "clean-up is impossible, the whole concept is flawed". The goalposts seem to keep shifting: first it's "where are the sources?"; then it's "where are the secondary sources?"; then it's "where are the good secondary sources", "good" being of course a subjective decision that that side would like to make.

I don't personally see how deleting the pages would help make Wikipedia better. I've worked to eliminate a lot of listcruft myself, but to my mind listcruft consists of lists of tangential and superficial references that don't illuminate anything about the subject beyond "this is popular". I think that these lists illuminate, or have the potential to illuminate, something important about the changing worldview of humans with regard to the universe around them.RandomCritic (talk) 01:25, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting tags[edit]

Actually, it is that easy. Just delete the code. Anybody can add them, anybody can remove them (although if someone feels strongly that the removal is erroneous, they're likely to reappear).RandomCritic (talk) 01:44, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Altair in fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aquila (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Betelgeuse Resolved IOTA.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Betelgeuse Resolved IOTA.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:55, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Betelgeuse Resolved IOTA.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Betelgeuse Resolved IOTA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:30, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Cetus as constellation tail.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cetus as constellation tail.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:07, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Help Survey[edit]

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 17:39, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Gully foyle at vega.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Gully foyle at vega.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:27, 29 June 2012 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:27, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:VaganovaEntrywayCloseUpMay2009.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:VaganovaEntrywayCloseUpMay2009.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 (talk) 10:28, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Nelson column starlight barking.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nelson column starlight barking.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:39, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:VaganovaEntrywayCloseUpMay2009.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:VaganovaEntrywayCloseUpMay2009.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:45, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Riple sun.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Riple sun.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:06, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Binary stars in fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pitch Black (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nebulae in fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andromeda Nebula (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nebulae in fiction[edit]

Hi. Several issues with Nebulae in fiction:

Please use plain text for trademarks etc, see MOS:TM. In particular something like the Youtube logo should only be used on the Youtube article.
Please don't misuse things like the |date= parameter in a cite template for other information. Those parameters generate metadata which would become unreliable.
Please check copyright status before linking to Youtube, see WP:YT. Generally if a professional product has not recognisably been uploaded by the author or the organisation for which it was made, it will be a copyright violation and cannot be used here. I have removed the link for the Xenomorph game music.
Please rethink the use of bold and purple for nebula names etc, see MOS:BOLD and MOS:COLOR. Purple and blue are particularly bad choices in any case for highlighting text as they are often used by browsers for visited and unvisited links. We generally stay away from "clever" per-article conventions like that as it makes articles idiosyncratic for the reader and difficult for editors. There are other uses of bold which contravene MOS:BOLD which I think can also be removed.

--Mirokado (talk) 17:37, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, OperaJoe! More coming! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mlbphd (talk • contribs) 04:21, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I need help with an overly aggressive editor.[edit]

I am very depressed. An editor name DragonflySixtyseven decided that all of my scientific work and discoveries (cited nearly 470 times by reputable and verifiable sources) were not important enough to be noted in Wikipedia. So not only did he remove my profile page, but then he took it one step further and decided to remove the Rome's Revolution page, first put into production by an editor named Andrew and tweaked by you. You or another editor also improved the paragraph on using the Grey Drive to convert xenon atoms into Hawking Radiation providing a higher specific impulse than a traditional ion drive. How is this not notable? It is novel, it is valid and my book is outselling three of the books above mine.

I am at a loss. A little guidance, please.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mlbphd (talk • contribs) 17:08, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your questions[edit]

1. I don't personally know anything about User:Nikkimaria, but his record of contributions shows that he's been around for a long time, and has been fairly active, but since January of this year he's been cutting a wide swath through a very large number of Wikipedia articles, almost exclusively deleting material, with uninformative edit summaries such as "cleanup", "cull" and "rm non-RS". The latter summary seems to go with deletions of references.

2. I would start by reverting the deletions and asking (in the reversion, in Talk, possibly at User talk:Nikkimaria) for a detailed discussion regarding the material to take place on one or more talk pages. Given the general character of these deletions, I'm not confident that that would be productive, but it's a necessary starting point.

3. Further steps can be found at WP:CONTENTDISPUTE. Either the noticeboard or a request for comment seems like a reasonable next step, if discussion is non-productive. Only if those fail would a mediation request be warranted.

4. I think you'd make a great administrator. For a guide as to how to get started, go to WP:GRFA, which also links to other guides on the same subject. The actual application structure is at WP:RFA. If you decide you want to do this, I suggest you read through these guides before doing anything further in the current conflict you're involved in, as it might influence the strategy you choose to take. Best of luck, and don't hesitate to ask me if you need anything else! RandomCritic (talk) 19:11, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, in addition, you'll probably find it very helpful to look at the cleanup tagging guidelines at WP:TC.RandomCritic (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Weigela foliage in garden.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Weigela foliage in garden.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Twinsun vectors.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Twinsun vectors.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 05:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uxarieus.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Uxarieus.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 23:35, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Lunar collapse.jpg[edit]

The file File:Lunar collapse.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unencyclopedic image of a fictional scenario. Removed from Black holes in fiction as unnecessary for context

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 22:14, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vance Marune 01 full aud.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vance Marune 01 full aud.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗plicit 02:51, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vance Marune 06 half aud.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vance Marune 06 half aud.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Dark crystal triple sun.jpg[edit]

The file File:Dark crystal triple sun.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused orphaned personal artwork.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Twinsun.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Twinsun.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Mars hypotrochoid.jpg[edit]

The file File:Mars hypotrochoid.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Was used only in Black holes in fiction for an original research footnote of questionable relevance, before I removed this content in July 2019.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 16:40, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Observer cometary system.jpg[edit]

The file File:Observer cometary system.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused image, no context to determine possible future use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 11:14, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stars and planetary systems in fiction for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stars and planetary systems in fiction, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stars and planetary systems in fiction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]