User talk:Optakeover/Archive/2014/February

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Nice work on the anti-vandalism work. I came across a number of vandals you reverted and in many cases resulted in a block. Keep up the great work! Mkdwtalk 05:24, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the barnstar! From an admin, this is the sweetest one yet. Cheers! Optakeover^(Talk) 07:23, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Irwin

She didn't seem that notable to me --StupidFeminist1999 (talk) 02:40, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Please carry on with the article proposal for deletion discussion. Personally I feel that with enough citations, she is notable enough for Wikipedia. My apologies for the revert and warning. Optakeover^(Talk) 02:44, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Ultracraft Cabinetry

Hi Optakeover, I wanted to let you know that shortly after you tagged Wikipedia:Ultracraft Cabinetry for speedy deletion, I moved the page back to User:David Carter Roy. Kind regards, Mathonius (talk) 15:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Mathonius for your help. I have untagged the page as it is now in userspace. Optakeover^(Talk) 15:57, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Nfomamdoalfrlpsa

Hi Optakeover. This guy comes from a large agricultural family: sock farm 1, sock farm 2. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 08:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Lol. Too bad I'm not really good with SPIs. Optakeover^(Talk) 08:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

It took me some time too. The recent Sukhoi Superjet 100 edit-war helped me connect the socks and the IP. The master is so prolific that not all have been tagged or blocked yet. Now the two SPIs have been merged into one. At least all the socks are in one farm now. :) Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 08:41, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Plagiarism

Hello Re the page I've just edited (I've messed up the reference so can you please undo this as well). My point is that the page is small and you refer to plagiarism in the main section and then you refer to the same plagiarism in the next section "controversy" section. It just doesn't read correctly. I was not trying to remove the reference I was just going to move all of the information to the right section of the page and make the page only refer to the information once instead of twice. It would be worth you doing this to improve the editorial quality of the page.

Cheers Dave — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davethawley (talk • contribs) 14:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello Dave, thank you for your message, and thank you for helping to improve the article! Next time, try to complete all your edits first, as such removal of information, especially since that it is completely good information with citations, can be seen by me and others as vandalism. Also, it will be extremely helpful to include an edit summary, so that others will know the reason why you made the edit. Thank you, and happy editing! Optakeover^(Talk) 14:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Updates to page 'Catherine Hanley'

Hi

I updated some amazon links for this page. The old links were to the old versions of the books, published by Quaestor2000 and now out of print. The new links are to the new editions of the books from The History Press. The page as currently published is wrong, so could you please allow the new version to be published. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.45.225 (talk) 14:40, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello. Generally, you should avoid linking to pages like Amazon, as it is better to link to other article where the books are talked about, which provides a more neutral and encyclopedic source. However, it is not explicit that such links are against the rules, so I will let it go for now. Thank you for your notice! Optakeover^(Talk) 14:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for this. I have deleted all the links to Amazon. The main thing I wanted to do was include The History Press as the publisher rather than Quaestor2000, so this didn't really need the links. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.45.225 (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

I'm just trying to figure out how to reference things on beta and properly format my citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmjoseph (talk • contribs) 08:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm just trying to figure out how to reference things on beta and properly format my citations. Thanks for showing me the sandbox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmjoseph (talk • contribs) 08:15, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello Tmjoseph! Thank you for your efforts in improving Wikipedia! I'm glad that you now know about the sandbox. However, I have just realized that I have removed other information which you added, which were perfectly good. For that reason, I want to apologise for removing what you wrote. Next time, I will be more careful. Cheers! Optakeover^(Talk) 08:22, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Edits to Da Nang

Hey there. I have no problem with editors improving content, but this was quite a bit of content added with no reference at all. I thought I understood that lengthy, unsourced additions like that could be challenged and removed, am I incorrect there? —Josh3580_talk/hist 08:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

I understand. Please wait till I make my edit, and tell me if you are okay with it. Optakeover^(Talk) 08:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

No problem at all, my friend. —Josh3580_talk/hist 08:33, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Done. Please check it out. Wikipedia is a team effort which everybody is involved in, and we should all try our best to reduce the loss of good-faith edits. I am an anti-vandal patroller like you, but when necessary, I do try my best to get down and dirty. Thanks! Optakeover^(Talk) 08:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Much better. It still has some issues, but thank you so very much for fixing what could be fixed, and tagging what still needs to be fixed. Two thumbs up for you, my friend. —Josh3580_talk/hist 08:45, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

You're very welcome. This is the least I could do, of course as a patroller, I don't usually spend as much time improving the quality of others' edits. Thanks for your help Josh, and happy patrolling! Optakeover^(Talk) 08:47, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Mentoring

Hi, I'm mentoring them and many other teams writing articles. They asked for my help and were confused between two pages. I hope you will undo your changes. --Arianit (talk) 13:45, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Done. My apologies for the mistake. Optakeover^(Talk) 23:56, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your understanding. --Arianit (talk) 05:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

David Graziano Wikipedia page

Hey Optakeover - Thanks for checking. I was trying to update David's Wiki page, but was having trouble, as this is my first go round on Wikipedia. The last version of his page is how it should read; do you have the ability to revert it, or if not, I'm happy to go back in and reset it.

Thanks,

-Eliotmurray (talk) 01:19, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Done. Thank you for informing me. My apologies for my error. Optakeover^(Talk) 02:01, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Lovefilm

Hi you undid my edit on Lovefilm I added that because lovefilm is no longer active it is being redirect to amazon instant video uk. Lovefilm was dessolved as of yesterday. There twitter account and facebook account was deleted. And they created a new one for amazon instant video uk. 176.24.9.44 (talk) 15:52, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

I would appreciate if you cited a source. Thanks, Optakeover^(Talk) 15:55, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

hi it redirect everyone from lovefilm here http://www.lovefilm.com 176.24.9.44 (talk) 15:59, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your source. Could you also write in the article that the site now redirects to this new page? Thank you, Optakeover^(Talk) 16:01, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

ok Paladox2017 (talk) 15:07, 28 February 2014 (UTC)