User talk:Orabela/sandbox

Re: Proposed edits - The first suggestion is no good unless you're paraphrasing a secondary source. Otherwise, it qualifies as original research, which Wikipedia doesn't want. Ditto for the second. The last two are fine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by S.C. Kaplan (talk • contribs) 17:06, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Several problems with the bibliography. First, there should be 1 book max, since you are supposed to be finding sources to consult (that is, read) within the next few weeks. Second, these references are not properly formatted - can't just copy-paste.