User talk:Organometalic1

Extended content

Welcome Hello Organometalic1, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: Table of contents Department directory Need help? Questions — a guide on where to ask questions. Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes. Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations Article wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles The simplified ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules. Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia. How you can help: Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help. Community portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity. Additional tips... Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. Organometalic1, good luck, and have fun. --Aboutmovies (talk) 07:03, 9 June 2012 (UTC) Warning: Unsourced and Enreferanced Edits on page Wahhabi This is a warning for; (1.) Unsourced and Enreferanced Edits on page Wahhabi (2.) Vandalizing pages with suspected malcontent at play - i.e. input of information with intention of decimating the historical legacy of a religious tradition This is unacceptable and this behavior violates WP:NPOV and you have done this on several accounts verging on 4 times now - you have been warned by myself before I take this to a higher authority on Wikipedia. Sakimonk (talk) 23:27, 10 June 2012 (UTC) Warning Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as seen in Wahhabi, you may be blocked from editing. Sakimonk (talk) 02:15, 11 June 2012 (UTC) June 2012 Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Wahhabi appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:05, 11 June 2012 (UTC) Your recent editing history at Wahhabi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:19, 11 June 2012 (UTC) This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as seen in Wahhab, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dadude3320 02:39, 11 June 2012 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for a period of forty-eight hours for edit-warring and violating the three-revert rule on Wahhabi. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- tariqabjotu 03:15, 11 June 2012 (UTC) Report Notice Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Sakimonk (talk) 01:17, 14 June 2012 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Skier Dude (talk) 01:37, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom unblock appeal

The Arbitration Committee has carefully considered the appeal of Wikitruths3 (talk · contribs) and has declined to unblock that account and related accounts either known or discovered during the investigation. After six months of not editing Wikipedia under any account including IP accounts the user may again apply to have the block reviewed.

For the Arbitration Committee SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 11:45, 26 August 2012 (UTC)