User talk:Orkhan ankara

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Orkh (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.
(see: block log • contributions • deleted contributions • autoblocks)

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect intellectual property rights - do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view when editing articles - this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Fullobeans (talk) 19:07, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iraqi Turks[edit]

Hi. Don't you think it is more correct to rename the article "Iraqi Turkmen" to "Iraqi Turks", since "The term Turkmen for Iraqi Turks seems to have been created during the course of the discussion on the Mosul issue in the third decade of the last century, in order to isolate the Iraqi Turks from Turkey" and since it creates confusion with Turkmenistan? see Turkish diaspora

--Bunifa88 (talk) 12:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seljuk Sultanate of Rum[edit]

Hi, Orkhan ankara. Please take a look at the discussion at Talk:Sultanate_of_Rûm#extremely_dubious_flag. The flag you have added lacks a reliable source and is described as that of the Great Seljuq Empire not the Sultanate of Rûm. Moreover a flag-based succession box is impossible for the Seljuks of Rum both because the successor states are so many (see Anatolian Turkish Beyliks) and none possess reliably sourced flags. I think we should leave both the flag and the succession box out of the article. If you disagree, please participate in the talkpage discussion before adding it again. Regards, Aramgar (talk) 22:55, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate in discussions here. We would appreciate your opinion. :) Aramgar (talk) 23:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you speak English? Do you understand about talkpages? Please respond. Aramgar (talk) 15:16, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Three revert rule[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Aramgar (talk) 23:57, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seljuk Sultanate of Rum was a part of the Great Suljuks , Sultanate of Rum became a de-facto independence state after the mongol attacks againts great suljuk empire

WHY NON-TURK TALK ABOUT SELJUKS ?

armenians talk about SELJUK ! they can not be objective !

November 2008[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sultanate of Rûm. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Please read the talk page regarding insertion of flag icons. Also, please note that what you are actually inserting does not, in fact, contain an image. Kafka Liz (talk) 16:08, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Saka, you will be blocked from editing. SamEV (talk) 20:04, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009[edit]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Sultanate of Rûm. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kafka Liz (talk) 11:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Orkhan ankara. The problem is that the flags are not attested in any reliable sources. There is no evidence that Great Seljuks or the Seljuks of Rum used it.The arguments against their inclusion have been presented on the relevant talkpage, and I see from your talkpage that you have been invited to participate in the discussion several times [1], [2], [3]. Please come to relevant talkpage and explain your views. There is no need for threats. Kafka Liz (talk) 18:04, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, I would urge you not to revert it again without discussion, as you are quite close to violating our three revert rule. In all seriousness, talk to us so we can try to reach an understanding. Kafka Liz (talk) 18:20, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you expert about Turkish history? Seljuk Rum was inside of Great Seljuk after the Mongol attacks Great Seljuk collapsed in iran but Anatolia Seljuk or Sultanate of Rum continued... thats it .. Sultanate of Rum is not independence from Great Seljuk. it was part of Great Seljuk Like Turkey and Ottoman Empire

Hi Orkhan ankara. I am not an expert on Turkish history, but I have read enough to know that your statements are not quite accurate. The Seljuk Sultanate of Rum was one of four successor states to the Great Seljuk empire, as you will see if you read the relevant section of the article. Furthermore, the flags you you keep adding are completely unattested and unhistorical, as multiple editors have pointed out. Wikipedia requires that the information we add be cited to reliable sources, and without such, these flags ought not be added. Kafka Liz (talk) 21:56, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 13:57, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What were you talking about on my talk page? Thanks, my name inc ^{Ottoman project} 20:21, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification[edit]

Hi. Your recent edits are being discussed here. Kafka Liz (talk) 23:10, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Due to identical edit patterns as User:Orkh who has been indefinitely blocked and has previously created new sockpuppet accounts to evade that block, this account is now indefinitely blocked as a suspected sockpuppet of Orkh.

Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 05:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]