Jump to content

User talk:Osm agha

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Salam

[edit]

Hi there, Osm. Thank you - I only wish there were others to share the honor with me. Unfortunately, I don't have any contributions in the Arabic Wikipedia, but that's probably because I am not very efficient with Arabic and I am already quite busy in life. :-)

Oh, and there's nothing wrong with your English. As a matter of fact, it's perfect. ;-) Tell me, Osm, how are medical studies in Syria? I'm curious. —Anas talk? 23:40, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009?

[edit]

Hello. FYI, I reverted an edit of yours. I assume "December 2009" was a typo?  Doulos Christos ♥ talk  21:15, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, it's February not December --Osm agha (talk) 18:13, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed it, it is Feb 2009 not Dec 2008 nor (for sure :)) Dec 2009 --Ciphers (talk) 04:24, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

I've given you IP block exemption.

Request handled by: PhilKnight (talk) 22:45, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Thank you --Osm agha (talk) 08:22, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

[edit]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to User:Malikakbar/islam. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. ZooFari 20:15, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

[edit]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. Thank you.--John (talk) 03:03, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting my edits

[edit]

Hello John, I believe you are right. I should have added references before adding the categories to the articles. I will revert your edit in the article about Nicolas Anelka because it's mentioned in the article that he is a muslim with references. In the other articles, I will put some references before adding any categories. Kind Regards --Osm agha (talk) 18:34, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you can speak French, you can take a look on this. Regards --Osm agha (talk) 18:43, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You disappointed me John, the article about Franck Ribéry also mentions that he converted to Islam! --Osm agha (talk) 18:50, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Osm agha and thanks for your understanding of our policy on living people. I only inspected two of the edits you made before reverting all the category edits you had made. I quite agree that this information is appropriate if it can be verified. Best wishes, --John (talk) 01:07, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BLP

[edit]

I have reverted your addition of controversial material to the Nicholas Anelka article. The reference provided does not meet the reliable source criteria as required in all biographies of living people articles. Regards, --ponyo (talk) 19:01, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that. The user who deleted these information did not say why he did it. So, I thought this was a kind of vandalism and reverted his edit. --Osm agha (talk) 19:50, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No worries - I have a feeling that this same info is likely to keep popping up in the article as any new salicious gossip is apt to do, but until it can be reliably sourced you will likely see it removed repeatedly as well. Cheers, ponyo (talk) 20:05, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aftonbladet edits

[edit]

bbc copied sections are quotes that has to be present as it is without any modification. they are not copyrighted by bbc. don't remove them —Preceding unsigned comment added by Awanta (talkcontribs) 17:49, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

welcome

[edit]

Hi Osm, I noticed you don't seem to have ever received a proper welcome. Here it is. Kind regards--Joopercoopers (talk) 12:06, 11 November 2009 (UTC) Welcome![reply]

Hello, Osm agha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Thnks Joopercoopers, finally I have a welcome message! Kind regards --Osm agha (talk) 18:30, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm wrting this article and don't read sources in arabic. Since I saw you edited the Syrian portal, I thought you might help out completing the list....? --Midrashah (talk) 19:57, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate

[edit]

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. Feel free to participate in the journal.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reach@wikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

DiptanshuTalk 06:25, 12 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.[reply]