User talk:Ostroumovroman

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roman Ostroumov (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Notcharizard was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roman Ostroumov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 14:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Ostroumovroman! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- NotCharizard 🗨 14:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ammonia-based Carbon capture and Desulfurization technologies (ADSC) (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ammonia-based Carbon capture and Desulfurization technologies (ADSC) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ammonia-based Carbon capture and Desulfurization technologies (ADSC) (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ammonia-based Carbon capture and Desulfurization technologies (ADSC) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 15:24, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ammonia-based Carbon capture and Desulfurization technologies (ADSC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ammonia-based Carbon capture and Desulfurization technologies (ADSC), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jamiebuba (talk) 15:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ammonia-based Carbon capture and Desulfurization technologies (ADSC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ammonia-based Carbon capture and Desulfurization technologies (ADSC), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. S0091 (talk) 16:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ammonia-based Carbon capture and Desulfurization technologies (ADSC) (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ammonia-based Carbon capture and Desulfurization technologies (ADSC) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 16:52, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Hello Ostroumovroman. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ostroumovroman. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ostroumovroman|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. S0091 (talk) 18:02, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

With this message I confirm that I do not receive any remuneration for editing articles and I do not receive any secret remuneration, in this article I want to talk about new carbon capture technologies such as CCUF and EADS, which are the continuation of the well-known technologies such as CCU and CCS and CCUS, but based on a completely different principle, namely the capture of ammonia and the subsequent production of fertilizer, this technology is patented in China and will also be supplemented with references to patents. Please note that there is no mention of these technologies in the Wiki. Ostroumovroman (talk) 18:15, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

What is your affiliation with Jiangnan Environmental Protection/JNG/JNEP? It is best to transparent because it is clear you are affiliated. S0091 (talk) 19:58, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

I am an employee of this company, which holds the patents for the technology, all research and development. Ostroumovroman (talk) 20:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

I have also removed any mention of this company and any comparisons to other technologies so that it does not constitute advertising or show its superiority or vice versa. Ostroumovroman (talk) 20:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

What part of Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. from the above was unclear to you? Anyway, you vastly misunderstand Wikipedia so the best advice I can give is to move on because your purpose does not align with Wikipedia's purpose. There are other venues to promote your company's technologies and this is not one them. 20:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC) S0091 (talk) 20:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

That's the point, I'm not looking to get remuneration or profit from this technology. I just need to leave the description and the basic meaning of this technology for any of the users, without referring to any company or interested party. Ostroumovroman (talk) 20:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

You are an employee of the company so you do have a financial interest thus must follow the above guidelines. Period. Promoting the technology is promoting the company that created the technology, whether you mention the company or not. Also, a Wikipedia article simply is summarizes what intellectually independent secondary reliable sources have written about a topic and that coverage has to be in-depth to meet the notability guidelines. What those affiliated have said, written or published is not useful. It does not appear such sources exist as none were cited and the draft was blatantly promotional. S0091 (talk) 20:41, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

I apologize for the misunderstanding, I read the rule, but I didn't understand where I have to indicate company affiliation.

I'll certainly do that, but I didn't realize if I can still post the article if I specify that or not?

Do I have to specify it when creating an article or change it in my profile? Ostroumovroman (talk) 20:54, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

I'm new to this and just starting my interesting journey into the world of Wiki. Ostroumovroman (talk) 20:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

As the instructions state, you post your affiliation on your User page. You can create another draft but I strongly suggest you do not because those with a conflict of interest, especially with financial interest, have a an extremely low success rate (less than 1%) and wastes the time of Wikipedia's most precious resource, it's volunteers, such as myself and all the others (your draft has taken the time of at least four volunteers). Think about that before you move forward. If you do not have superior sources, such as peer-reviewed scholarly journals, books published by reputable publishers or mainstream media outlets (see WP:RSP for common sources and Wikipedia's reliability assessment), then it also likely a waste of your time. Not to mention you have to able write dispassionately to meet the neutral point of view policy. S0091 (talk) 21:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ammonia-based Carbon capture and Desulfurization technologies (ADSC) (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ammonia-based Carbon capture and Desulfurization technologies (ADSC) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 19:44, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Roman Ostroumov

Hello, Ostroumovroman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roman Ostroumov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)